I'm getting ready to order my NP9150 and I'm debating on the wireless card. I don't really feel I need bluetooth as I had it on my last laptop and never used it. Yet, is the 3 antenna Killer 1103 card really that much better then the 3 antenna Intel 6300? I've heard of some reliability issues with the Killer yet also some good results of speed and range. Any thoughts? Cheers.
-
-
- The N1103 comes with a bandwidth control tool.
- Lower ping than Intel 6300 in games when downloading in the background.
- Better UDP management.
- N1103 crashed twice. But Intel 6300 crashed at least 10 times during this 2 months usage when the UDP connection is aggressively being established while using P2P transfering software.
-
Support.3@XOTIC PC Company Representative
For gaming the 1103 is better because of the software it comes with. Other then that you'll see get the same range and max transfer speeds.
-
I appreciate the responses, is the software that comes with it fairly easy to use/straight forward and work well?
-
-
Haven't really used the Killer software at all. Everything has been working great though.
-
Tom's Hardware has shown that the 1103 is a superior card overall.
-
1103 seems to be lowering once's latency.. no-brainer for gamers
-
+1 to the 1103. I'm not a fan of the software, (You can do anything in that software with a decent router) but the hardware has proven to be the best.
The support from the Killer team is great as well. -
Right-o thanks for the information, looks like the Killer 1103 is the card for me. Cheers for this.
-
No bluetooth and some reviews I've read indicate that there isn't much tangible difference, I personally got the Intel 6235 after reasonable research. I'll try to find those reviews.
Debating which Wireless card
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by drummerboy, Aug 30, 2012.