The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    I should be getting my computer next week ...

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by burkle25, Jul 27, 2007.

  1. burkle25

    burkle25 Are you a color?

    Reputations:
    1,339
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I should be getting my computer next week and I was wondering what I should use to test it out?

    Sager NP5790


    I already have PCMark05, 3DMark05 and 06.
     
  2. mattireland

    mattireland It used to be the iLand..

    Reputations:
    261
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You should definitely use SuperPi to test your processor - see this thread: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=41097

    Other than that, just put it through it's paces e.g. video editing e.t.c. and see how it performs.

    Good luck and I'm sure you'll love it! It's a good notebook and I love 17"s.
     
  3. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Again.... SuperPI is a useless program in today's era of multi-cores.

    Its single-threaded, inaccurate, and a poor benchmark for any multi-core system.

    Use wPrime for true multi-core benchmarking.

    http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=123570 (which replaced the old Super PI thread)
     
  4. Akilae Hunter

    Akilae Hunter Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Gophn, you're pretty evangelical about wPrime, eh?
    Though I agree with you anyway...

    HD Tach? or HD Tune? I forgot the name.
     
  5. Agent CoolBlue

    Agent CoolBlue Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    619
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    its HD tune.
     
  6. dit_xi

    dit_xi Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    86
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Gophn and Chaz, could y'all please post a "how to run benchmark tests" guideline and make it a sticky for us ign'rant newbies, or has that already been posted somewhere.
     
  7. Agent CoolBlue

    Agent CoolBlue Notebook Deity NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    619
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    aren't benchmarks like 3dmark 05 and 06 straightforward enough? Just download, install, run it, and be happy with you score. Correct me if I'm wrong.
     
  8. dit_xi

    dit_xi Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    86
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    yeah, they're pretty straightforward when I ran them. but i was wondering if there was something more that the x'perts with their enlightened insights can impart to us ign'rant newbies who ain't too spiffy with interpreting the data and numbers.
     
  9. ShadowoftheSun

    ShadowoftheSun Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    27
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    3DMark is pretty useless outside of very specific circumstances. It's great to track changes across one machine when upgrading hardware or drivers, or to compare two very similar machines from the same generation. However, its usefulness fades when used to compare widly different machines or computers from different generations, which will inevitably happen if you post your benchmarks. I'm not saying don't run it- do so, if only to track performance changes across driver updates and hardware upgrades- but don't take it as the gospel.

    In-game benchmarks are much more effective. Games like FEAR and HL2: Lost Coast contain in-game benchmarks that are much more effective for comparative purposes than 3DMark.

    Xtreme systems has a thread which lists good benchmarks that are also hard to fake. Scroll down to post 10 for the reliable benchmarks list.
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=46926