http://www.gameswelt.de/articles/hardware/5161-Schenker_goes_Extreme/
Looks like August 22nd, a M57TU was tested and recieved a 3D Mark score of 10,500 in 3D Mark 06. X9100 has a 400mhz overclock. Not much higher than the 9800M GT, but its an improvement.
-
Is that improvement worth $365 a card?
-
whats the score on a similar spec'd 9800m gt rig?
-
Maybe Notebookcheck was right after all
-
I think the 9800M GT with a X9100 gets in the high 9k range. Not worth the extra $$$, but i paid for it
-
the card rele shines in that extra 512 MB of vram... (a total of 1 gb). On Call of Duty 4 it won't. But for an RTS with lots of units like supreme commander, the soon Starcraft 2, and even a powerful FPS like crysis, you WILL see a difference. Moreso on RTS games than FPS. I haven't seen a GT vs. GTX bench on Crysis yet. remember guys, 3dmark has no true bearing over real world performance, only a general standing.
-
we shall see, I wonder who gets their rig first emike- i havnt heard anything
from sager this week regarding my order.....
Sager NP5796
Chassis: Black/Orange Trim (a black chassis w/ silver trim would be a nice feature)
Display: 17” WUXGA 1920x1200
Processor: 45nm Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 / 6mb L2 Cache, 3.06Ghz, 1066Mhz FSB
Graphics: NVidea GeForce 9800M GTX 1Gb DDR3
OS: Vista Business 64/bit
Memory: 4 GB Dual Channel DDR3 SDRAM @ 1066mhz – 2x 2048MB
HD: 320GB 7200RM 16MB cache 7200.3 SATA II
2 gb turbo memory module
No dead pixel policy
3 year warranty
M57TU w/X9100 & 9800M GTX 3DMark
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by emike09, Aug 25, 2008.