My NP9262 benchmark(with 9800M GTX in sli)....

........well after one day of transfer my 'data' to my new NP9262 and installing almost everything i need(RAID 0 is really good for installing, it taken me like only a few mins to install some thing that's over 4 G ) and i thought it is time to do some benchmark.....
here is my system spec
CPU:q9650
gragh card: dual 9800m GTX in sli
hard drive: 3*500G in RAID 0
optical drive: UJ-220(i ordered it before backorder )

the test 1 is at performance and test 2 is at Extreme both in 3Dmark vantage

 

Congrats, there's 3 of us now on this forum with 9800m GTX SLI, please post 3dmark06 scores as well game benchmarks when u have a chance.

ohh and post the temps as well

 

could you also post the scores here zyx1989 clikety click

 

3D Mark 06 plllssss!!!

 

well.....i think i should tested my system before i installed any thing.....but it is too late now......i saw some people got higher benchmark with 9800m GT in sli than my 9800m GTX in sli..........and ..... in game test coming soon.....

 

I never get this but people who always get their hands first on a new system that everyone is awaiting the benchmarks for, always do the wrong benchmarks. Everyone is awaiting the 3dmark06 score or Crysis score but u can never get it, instead u get a vantage score or pcmark score first.

 

Install the 177.92 driver before you run benchmarks.

 

you have them as well?? can you post some benchmarks? I'll have mine tomorow or begin next week.

 

I have mine on order but they wont come for at least another week or so.

 

I wonder what the real difference is between the 9800M GTX SLI and the 8800M GTX SLI...

 

Might want to put 177.98 on so you can run PhysX on your GPUs. You'll get a sick 3D Mark Vantage score that way.

3D Mark 06 is widely recognized, however 3D Mark Vantage represents a better synthetic benchmark of a true gaming experience. Ya'll might want to start getting familiar with it's scores.

 

Except doing that makes it almost impossible to compare scores between nvidia and radeon.... which again puts 3dmark06 as a stander benchmark.

 

Well technically it will run on a radeon too. In fact, nVidia even supports ATI doing so.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-ati-physx,5841.html

Props to anybody else who can do it

 

I'm talking here and now, not x amount of months into the future.

 

Well as far as I can tell the 9800 GTX Sli option does not significantly improve performance over the 9800M GT Sli, but I could be wrong.IMO not worth all the extra money.

 

No it´s only 112 SP´s vs 96 SP´s which the 9800m GT and 8800m GTX has. Not worth the money in my opinion.

 

Me as an eventual buyer of 9800 GTX SLI (owner of an XPS 8700 SLI) I am really looking forward to have see how it performs before final decision.
cheers

 

I have been wondering that same thing....Is it worth the extra $$$ to get the gtx sli vs the gt sli??

We are talking about $600 upgrade for the GTX vs GT....is it really worth it??

 

Absolutely not worth it. Take that 600$ and put it towards future upgrades that actually could be considerer ed upgrades or towards a entire new system.

 

Well im looking at a MAXED 9262:
SAGER NP9262 Ultimate Custom Laptop (Built on Clevo D900C / D901C)
- 17" WUXGA "Glare Type" Super Clear Ultra Bright Glossy Screen (1920x1200)
- Arctic Silver 5 Thermal Compound
- Standard Dead Pixel Policy
- ~Intel Core 2 QUAD Q9650 3.0GHz w/ 12MB L2 Cache - 1333MHz FSB
- SLI ENABLED DUAL (2) 1,024MB (2,048MB TOTAL) PCI-Express nVidia 9800M GTX w/GDDR3 Video Cards (User Upgradeable) <<<??? (may go 9800 GT sli
- ~ 4,096MB DDR2 800 (2 SODIMMS) Dual Channel Memory (Requires Vista 64-Bit to recognize Full 4GB)
- Standard Finish
- ~Combo 8x8x6x4x Dual Layer DVD +/-R/RW 5x DVD-RAM 24x CD-R/RW Drive w/Softwares
- ~ 320GB 5400RPM (Serial-ATA II 300 - 8MB Cache)
- ~ 320GB 5400RPM (Serial-ATA II 300 - 8MB Cache)
- ~ 320GB 5400RPM (Serial-ATA II 300 - 8MB Cache)
- Raid 0-Stripe (Combines primary and secondary hard drive)( (Requires 2-3 Identical Sized Hard Drives)
- Internal 7-in-1 Card Reader (MS/MS Pro/MS Duo/MS Pro Duo/SD/Mini-SD/MMC/RS)
- Internal Bluetooth 2.0+ EDR
- Built-in Intel® PRO/Wireless 5300 802.11 a/g/n Wi-Fi Link
- Built in 2.0 Megapixel Camera
- None Standard
- Sound Blaster Compatible 3D Audio - Included
- Basic Black Business Case - Included
- Smart Li-ion Battery (12 Cell)
- ~Windows Vista Home Premium 64-Bit Installed (64&32-Bit CD Included) w/ Drivers & Utilities CD's
- 3 Year Labor* 1 Year Parts Warranty Lifetime 24/7 DOMESTIC Based Toll Free Telephone Tech Support
(Labor Warranty through Xotic PC)

$4,224.01

with the 9800 gt sli it would put me around $3624

I'm not sure..I'm already going 100% b@lls out...is it worth going 110% (GTX sli)

 

Your choice, but there isn't anyone who has shown that the 9800m gtx is even worth getting over a 9800 gt.

 

I may wait a month and see what others are saying, still it'd be nice to save 600$

 

I would wait for some scores, maybe 3DMARK06 scores(these benchmarks scores do not really give any idea of in game performance) just for comparison, maybe some game benchmarks would really help out better.
If you could just wait till we get more of an idea what we are dealing with, but hey it's your money and you want to go balls to the walls, I say go for it.
BUT $600 is $600.
Me personally I did not have the extra money for the GTX (also couldn't wait)

 

not at all worth it imo

 

3dmark06 and crysis benchmarks is the only thing that matters, seriously....don't waste your time with anything else.

 

You may want to wait a bit to see how the OCZ Whitebook will perform.
You just might be surprised

 

theres also the GTS to wait for

 

9800GTX in SLI!!!

Erhm...You've officially been awarded the "Person-With-Too-Much-Money" Award, we advise you to give to charity.

Thank You, and have a Nice Day.





Sorry from thread crapping

 

Well, the way I see it...if I'm going to spend $3600 on a laptop then an extra $600 isn't that much more for a future proof machine (assuming that GTX is a significant performance boost over GT).

 

Why would he need to wait on the GTS, when it's half the shaders of the GTX and 32 less shaders than the GT?

 

I haven't seen a single place where it says theres less shaders than the GT.

 

9800m GTS has 64 SP´s, 9800m GT has 96 SP´s it is like an 8800m GTX. Where the 9800m GTS has a 600 MHz core as opposed to 8800m GTS which has a 500 MHz Core.

 

SO... where are those 3dmark06 scores?

 

Specifications:


GeForce 9800M GTX

Stream Processors 112

Core Clock (MHz) 500

Shader Clock (MHz) 1350

Memory Clock (MHz) 800

Maximum Memory 1GB

Memory Interface 256-bit

Gigaflops 420




GeForce 9800M GT

Stream Processors 96

Core Clock (MHz) 500

Shader Clock (MHz) 1250

Memory Clock (MHz) 800

Maximum Memory 512MB

Memory Interface 256-bit

Gigaflops 360






GeForce 9800M GTS

Stream Processors 64

Core Clock (MHz) 600

Shader Clock (MHz) 1500

Memory Clock (MHz) 800

Maximum Memory 512MB

Memory Interface 256-bit

Gigaflops 240





GeForce 8800M GTX

Stream Processors 96

Core Clock (MHz) 500

Shader Clock (MHz) 1250

Memory Clock (MHz) 800

Maximum Memory 512MB

Memory Interface 256-bit

Gigaflops 360






GeForce 8800M GTS

Stream Processors 64

Core Clock (MHz) 500

Shader Clock (MHz) 1250

Memory Clock (MHz) 800

Maximum Memory 512MB

Memory Interface 256-bit

 

sigh was hoping to see some scores already, my lappy is built and ready, i would have it by now if i hadnt opted for the paint job, went all out
So I still have a month+ till i get mine. Please someone post some benchmarks aside from Vantage :0

 

Just curious, what kind of paint job are you getting for you 9262?

 

totally not worth it, consider that the ocz whitebook score over 15000 in 3dmark06 from killernotebook, yea.. im a best bang kind of guy, but its nice to have sli other then that, 9262 is butt ugly, thats all i gotta say about gtx sli

 

full paint job, having some graphic designed by a graphic artist.

 

Well those 3870 Crossfire didn´t even surpass my 8800m GTX SLI in Crysis, so who cares about a 15000 3D Mark score when they don´t beat my XPS M1730 NP9262 is a beast of a laptop.

 

What FPS do you in Crysis at 1900x1200 all high? (with no OC)
Have you posted that somewhere around here?

 

SCORES?! Where are the freakin scores man!?

LoL

 

What's up with the 9800M GTX in SLi? I see very few posts with benchmarks on this one, especially 3dMark06 and Crysis benchs.

Humm,

Trance

 

he benchmarked his laptop and it went boom and was never heard from again....

 

Yeah I agree post more benchmarks of both 9800m GT and 9800m GTX, especially 9800m GTX.

 

well, im working on a set of gaming benchmarks as we speak

 

Still waiting

 

I get 13714 on 3dmark06 with 9800M gt in SLI...

I was hoping for more

 

So I m the testing phase for Crysis Warhead for my my youtube channel and I have to say I have mixed feelings. Lets start with DX10. Here the game gets higher maximum FPS but also lower minimum FPS. In Original Crysis at 1650x1050 with all high settings I get minimum 35fps an average of 45-50 and maximum of close to 60fps. Now with Crysis Warhead all on high I get much higer maximum of well over 60fps but also much lower minimum that can drop clost to the 30fps line. Now I ve also tested Warhead in DX9 and here is a shock. All settings to high at WSXGA I get an average of 60fps!!!! Average!!! when I turn 2xAA I get 45fps. Seeing Crysis at super smooth magical 60fps is amazing but then again there is a noticeable graphics decrease, so I m gonna try to tweak that DX10 settings.

 

are you game playing or running the benchmark software?

 

I m game playing but I do have a very good eye for the FPS. There was only 2-3fps difference between my and FRAPS. and since FRAPS takes some power out I would say I m pretty good at judging framerates from gameplay.
I ll run FRAPS in a sec though to have the ultimate proof