Official bench thread for the x7200-NP7280

that video is drowning just as bad s that vga on battery....lol

 

Wait, what?

 

my comment:

my connection speed is faster than the video can upload.

as for the bench....the guy is benching it on battery in powersaver mode.
ergo..choppy slow bench...

if not me...then disregard.

 

I rang the benchmark test, it loaded the game and played it about 10times and never recorded a score, what am I doing wrong?

 

it does not give a score, just shows average FPS over the runs in the large field at the bottom of the window for the test

 

nice video, no hdmi in lol, I would be pissed if I got one without hdmi in, that unused port would bother me till the day the laptop left my hands. Oirgins the only carrier with hdmi in FYI at the moment.

 

This is all it showed after running for an hour


29/10/2010 2:53:36 p.m. - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1920x1080, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

29/10/2010 2:53:36 p.m. - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High

 

hmmm....should have only been about 5 minutes since it was 3 loops...

are all the settings the same as here?

 

There is not much to set, only detail level, path, x32 or x64, DX10, AA

I will play around a bit more at least i know its only 5 minutes

 

Pressed the > to the right of the "Add Runs" section, so that it shows up in the Queue?

 

Done that... beats me cant make it work


Whats time of day 9 mean

 

It sets the in-game time. I don't think you need to change that.
Or you could, if you have the time, run one time in daylight and once at night time.

 

This would be a good place to post your 3DMark 11 scores...

__

 

yeah i suppose here is better

This is the best I could get w/o SLI supported drivers... Result

 

dumbest thing i've ever heard, and an even worse analogy. antony van Leeuwenhoek discovered bacteria centuries ago. it is now the 21st century. don't mean to derail the thread; i just couldn't resist.

signed,
an anesthesiologist

 

You do know that fever is the process of your body to eliminate the bacteria.

 

^^ Very interesting topic, IMHO. Contemporary and conventional medicine asks certain questions and provides certain answers, but even though it's our mainstream help source, difficult to call it unbiased or uninfluenced. Ask yourselves, would it benefit those holding the steering wheel if we had no need for total cold&flu pills? I'm not saying we should obliviously jump to the other extreme and seek assistance from shrinks and shamans. But a healthy critical thinking may really help us if we really wish to get closer to the true nature of things.

 

yes, but does that initiate sickness? I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is. Read what he said.


or are you implying that the body always knows best? what about something like lupus, or primary disseminated coagulopathy, or sickle cell, to name a couple off the top of my head.

i don't dispute that the body knows best how to heal itself - medicine's role is to optimize that by focused interventions that halt a mal-functioning loop that progresses in a downward spiral.

a couple examples would be like mast cell degranulation in asthma and ventricular remodeling in heart failure which are "natural body reactions" to disease that are actually mal-adaptive.

sickness is a disruption in the balance not a "self-initiated correcting". I get that certain perceived symptoms can be reactions to restore homeostasis.


but what do i know. i'm totally biased and unenlightened.