The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Pros & Cons of 17" screen?

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by slo007, Dec 30, 2006.

  1. slo007

    slo007 Notebook Enthusiast NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm shopping for a desktop replacement computer, but I'm little unsure about buying a laptop with a 17" screen. Do I really need it? My desktop PC has a 16" LCD on the desk, and it works fine.

    The reason behind my interest in the Sager 17" is that I want a graphics video engine that will last a long time (won't go obsolete overnight), and apparently only the 17" models have the best gear. My desktop PC has a 6800 video card and, after 2 years, I can see it reaching into obsoleteness: it won't run MS FSim X; which I'd love to play with.

    Stuff I run: games, movies, video editing applications, 3D CAD, MS office

    Any feedback based on your person experience would be great! :)
     
  2. rickster

    rickster Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    MS FSX is buggy since it was rushed, it makes high end desktop systems cry.

    if you really want a future proof mobile GPU, 17/19/20 inches is the only way to go

    the catch though, is that the more pixels you have the more your video card works, making it show its weak side sooner. But I find it wasteful to buy a 17 inch screen and have the wxga resolution on it. So there's a bit of a dilemma there. It's all personal preference though. It's up to you to figure out the trade off between a powerful cumbersome laptop vs a portable laptop with inferior hardware. Though it looks like you made up your mind with your other thread.

    If you are still hesistant about getting a 17 inch screen then you might want to look into the 14 inch asus a8jp ($1300 @ newegg). It's video card is as good as the one's in 15.4 inch laptops and since it's 14 inches, it's obviously more portable.
     
  3. titaniummd

    titaniummd Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    70
    Messages:
    1,746
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The major CONS would be poor battery life and weight. If it's staying at home, then you have nothing to worry about.
     
  4. slo007

    slo007 Notebook Enthusiast NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks for the pointer... I'll check that system as well. :)
     
  5. srmalloy

    srmalloy Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    When I bought my D900K, I wanted a laptop that would run the same games I played on my desktop system, some of which would severely beat up a lesser machine. Portability was a consideration, but the relative portability of a mid-tower case, LCD monitor, keyboard, and trackball (ignoring the 17" CRT that the LCD monitor replaced) makes the D900K's weight a lot less of a consideration. With the projected use being a transportable computer that could be taken to a location, set up on AC power, and used for hours at a time, with only occasional use on internal battery power, the battery life wasn't a big issue, either. However, those are considerations if you intend to be using your laptop away from AC power and moving it around a lot. Deciding how you will be using your laptop is one of the major factors in deciding which laptop you get.
     
  6. SickPup404

    SickPup404 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    78
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    One other thing to keep in mind:

    I heard a rumor from a fairly reputable source that the DX10 GPU for laptops will probably not be available until 3Q 2008, not 2Q 2007 as I had heard before. So if you wanted to wait, it might be a while...

    Anyone else able to confirm/deny?