The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    RAID 5 on NP9262? Anyone running it?

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by dvfedele, Dec 4, 2008.

  1. dvfedele

    dvfedele Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hey everyone...thinking of running RAID 5 on an NP9262 (was going to use 3 sataII 250gb drives with 16mb cache). Anyone using it? How is the cpu peformance hit for the parity writing/reading? Thanks!
     
  2. Nintendam

    Nintendam Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I was using raid 5 but after multiple re-formats and countless "initializing volume status" (or something like that) each time the computer booted I gave up and switched to raid 0 with no problems

    doesn't answer your question but might give you insight
     
  3. Aryantes

    Aryantes Notebook Evangelist NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    445
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I used it for a little while, didn't notice any performance drops. I was running no RAID for a little while before that.

    However, I switched to RAID-0 for the write speed for installation/extraction of apps and running 3dsmax / autocad.

    I have (3) 200gb 7200rpm drives.
     
  4. Neil@Kobalt

    Neil@Kobalt Company Representative

    Reputations:
    1,230
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    RAID 5 does slow the laptop down, not by much but side by side with a system with a single drive there is a noticeable difference. If the data security is important to you or you use it as a server etc go for it, if you want better performance than a single drive you won't get it unles on RAID 0 or 1.

    THB if you want the data security you would be better off with 2 x 320 RAID 1 and then a third 320 - same total storage as 3 x 320 RAID 5 but doesn't affect system performance as much.
     
  5. dvfedele

    dvfedele Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    ok Neil thanks a lot...sounds like thats the best way to go. 2 drives raid 0 plus a third drive as backup :) thanks again!