Time Spy DX12 Benchmark Thread!

Okay so I am sure many of you are aware that "Time Spy" the new DX12 benchmark just came out! So lets see some results!

RULES:
Make it fair!
- Just start 3DMark, run the TimeSPY benchmark
- Post results with link!
- No custom runs and if you are overclocked mention clock speeds or else its useless!
- Driver version

I realize that async is automatically "off" for auto-runs, so if you change anything mention that async is on or off! Otherwise assume it is off.


My Stock 970m w/ 3610QM Drivers v368.39
GPU: 2222
CPU: 3240
Total: 2331
Link: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/31867

Overclock 970m +243 core, +543VRAM +25mV Drivers -same as above
GPU: 2731
CPU: 3272
Total: 2800
Link: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/32068

Overclock 970m +300core, +543VRAM +62mV Drivers - same as above
GPU: 2808
CPU: 3208
Total: 2861
Link: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/32918

My 2861 and 2808GPU is at this minute at least the highest single 970m overall and graphic score!!! HUUUAAAHHAHAHAAH - I just searched by similiar GPU and only SLI got me beat! It won't last long, so lets see some people destroy it!

 

I saw this came out, and I'm excited to see how some different systems handle on it. I want to start using this for our reviews so we have a DX11 and DX12 test in each one. Can't wait to see more results though. Nice work on having the best 970m results.

 

Ya the results would be interesting, I am looking forward to what people do with it, and more details on how they implemented async or how nvidia does it on the driver side.

Since we are the laptop section I am really looking forward to people posting results with 7970m/980m/960m etc laptop cards and seeing what they come up with, it would be nice to have some scores posted to see how they compare.

Tried to benchmark my 7970m - took out the 970m put in the 7970m . . . no results! Time Spy kept crashing. Maybe due to 2GB VRAM? I know with the 970m for the demo I get like ~2.5G VRAM usage. So i put back in my 970m . . . but its running hotter then before, I ran out of thermal paste so I just did what I could. Seems like no more overclocking till I can repaste.

Lets see some other results!

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE:
My "top score" 970m got killed already!

Some 970m with core OC'd to 1429! Thats +391Mhz! So someone got a nice overclock there.
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/53619

 

Stock 970m w/ 6700 Drivers v368.39
GPU: 2194
CPU: 4787
Total: 2388
Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13199407

Overclock 970m +225core, +350vram +50mV Drivers v368.39
GPU: 2655
CPU: 4871
Total: 2849
Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13344020?

Apparently CPU score has no impact on this test...

 

@anassa

3037

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13359651?

 

We have an official thread for this in Gaming as well - http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/3dmark-time-spy-benchmark.793889

I'm going to leave this one open but please share your results there also.

 

Nice scores! Ya I was surprised how little CPU had to do even with the overall score, it only makes a few hundred points difference.

NOOOOOO!! sure with a 6700k I am not suprised your overall score beat my 3610QM

But.. GPU score -> 2808 vs 2818 !!! Got me beat by only 10 points! Give me a month and a half... I will up my score!

Also seems like for some reason your benchmark isn't counted as valid or else it would have the top score!

Sorry! I didn't see that . . well I don't wander far from the sager/clevo thread. Thanks for the link.

 

Now I just have to break the 3k mark. @TBoneSan, whats your overclock?

The 970M temp during the overclock bench was only 59C, so hopefully I can press above 3000...

 

He can chime in too because I am also curious but according to the benchmark he posted:
1,398 MHz core ---> +360Mhz core ? (1398-1038) -->> Honestly if thats true that sounds right, at the high 200+ core overclock and going into 300+ it seems to bear little results.
1,332 MHz VRAM
6700k @ 4.5Ghz?!


This is off the top of my head . . . so if he could correct me it would be great!

 

3144 Overall - 2924 on the GPU

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13390355?

@steberg
@anassa

You can have a look at all my details in the screenshot. Keep benching by the way. It's good have someone make you push harder

p.s Scores should all validate. Only the driver is unapproved since I'm using a desktop one.


(going to start only posting here http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/clevo-overclockers-lounge.788975/page-419 - hard to keep track)