The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Tweak/OC a NP9262

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by joedread, Dec 13, 2008.

  1. joedread

    joedread Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    We all know of a few Guru's here on the net that can give some awesome suggestions when getting the max performance out of gaming. There are ways of which that are unsafe,uncalled 4,and very stable. Out of all the people out there with a NP9262, lets share some knowlege so we can :elvis: CRUSH the competition of gaming laptops in the world today. Sager is pushing their 8gb ram upgrade on the markets today for the NP9262 which is going overboard :rolleyes: , even with the Quad Core :D people ever thought of "in a remote imagination" that a Laptop can out preform 2x specs and abilty of the average gaming desktop PC running 6-8g's on 3DMARK 06 that is

    So..........who's hiding the goodies........." 15g's + in 3DMARK 06 "
     
    joedread, Dec 13, 2008
    #1
  2. dazzyd

    dazzyd Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    111
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Hi Joedread there are some us who have gotten more than 15k on their rigs. they are running xp and the latest QX9650 desktop chips.

    i myself have only managed a paltry 13200 marks on my rig :D
     
    dazzyd, Dec 13, 2008
    #2
  3. Johnksss

    Johnksss .

    Reputations:
    11,536
    Messages:
    19,464
    Likes Received:
    12,852
    Trophy Points:
    931
    that's only because you can't pin mod your q6700. and that is speculation at this point, with all that has happen since 6 months ago... :) or go grab the q6600 out of the desktop and pin mod it up to 3.0 ghz and run with the big dawgs at 1/3 rd the cost. :)
     
    Johnksss, Dec 13, 2008
    #3
  4. dazzyd

    dazzyd Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    111
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    yeh thats one the reasons.. most of the guys getting 15k are running xp too.. get a bit more performance than on vista
     
    dazzyd, Dec 13, 2008
    #4
  5. Johnksss

    Johnksss .

    Reputations:
    11,536
    Messages:
    19,464
    Likes Received:
    12,852
    Trophy Points:
    931
    nah, my scores are all under vista 32 bit. and a few 16k scores under xp.
     
    Johnksss, Dec 13, 2008
    #5
  6. dazzyd

    dazzyd Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    111
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    whoa 16k.. there you go.. that says it all :D
     
    dazzyd, Dec 13, 2008
    #6
  7. Johnksss

    Johnksss .

    Reputations:
    11,536
    Messages:
    19,464
    Likes Received:
    12,852
    Trophy Points:
    931
    yeah, but xp is easier than vista...so it means more coming from vista. besides...you can't run 3dmark vantage unless you have vista.
    and looking at your score... you can probably hit just about 14k with that setup.
    change them clocks to 640/940/1550
    set your nvidia control panel settings to performance. start 3dmark and wait about 2 minutes. make sure super fetch and windows indexing are not slowing you down. then run the benchmark.

    give it a try and see if you can get through the test with out your driver crashing. if so..you should have your new record... also... set your sli rendering to afr2.
     
    Johnksss, Dec 13, 2008
    #7