How come when I have the power options set to Maximum Processor State = 100%, when playing something intensive, processor stays at max when not even using the intensive program anymore; but when I put it to 99% instead of 100%, processor's power gets reduced like it is supposed to when not using the intensive program anymore?
Also, when I put Maximum Processor State = 50%, emulator fps is severly crippled. But for highly intensive games like RE6 or Sleeping Dogs, it actually SPEEDS THE GAME UP! Putting AA on max in Sleeping dogs doesn't cripple fps anymore also and both games stay at 60c-ish instead of 90c (cpu temps).
WHY?
(P.S.: this is 2 questions...)
-
I don't have any idea on the throttling unless you're setting minimum processor state to 100 without meaning to.
As for the gaming question though, emulators are highly CPU dependent (they're translating foreign instructions to native x86 or x64 instructions and executing them while also re-creating the environment that the original console would have provided as much as possible and this takes an insane amount of processing power) while most games are not. Sleeping Dogs is not a CPU intensive game.
It sounds like something isn't right with your throttling settings overall. One of the many reasons I just let the CPU work as its designed to. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
You need to use a program like XTU and monitor all assets of temps/behaviour to be assets be to draw any meaningful conclusions.
-
I get 59 fps with sleeping dogs with AA maxed with half processor power. If I do the full processor power, I get like 35 to 40 something max fps with the same settings. When looking at xtu while playing the game, the throttling meter doesn't even budge. It's always empty. All of my settings are default/normal. My laptop just got back from RMA and getting a new mobo and things are still the same as before (don't think there is a problem with the hardware).
When I put the pp to 100 it's like the intel system forget's that it is supposed to go back down when the intensive program is off. 99%, it acts like it's supposed to. Really feels like some kind of intel bug. -
-
Reinstalling seemed to fix the always at max power issue.
50% processor state (57.3fps this time) still gives more fps (sleeping dogs) than the full 100 (53.1fps) though. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Well like I said without more info you will never know.
-
What more info do you need? I already told you what the temps were. I already told you what the throttling level in ixu was. I already told you the processor power state in windows. I already told you the game settings. I already gave a game. I already told you that the IXU was on default settings. The only thing I didn't tell you was the machine is a 9380-s, 780m, i7-4930mx, nvidia driver 337.50.
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
A picture like this is a good place to START, you will see I put a note on there pointing to something, that's something I would expect from a more advanced user. Plus points go to those providing video feedback or pointing out specific places on the charts what the FPS was doing. Using a benchmark tool like the one in metro and syncing it to the data in the picture is even handier.
Telling me your average FPS and the odd temperature does not help. -
Edit: Or maybe not. I looked in the processes window of windows and saw that 'thunderbolt.exe' was using 13% CPU even though I've never used it and it is just on. So I closed it and the processor frequency is fluctuating again. So i guess the tiniest of processes can affect it. I wish there was some kind of blacklist or whitelist program I can use that lets me set what program can influence turboboost.
Maybe since the processor isn't being fully accessed by anything (including background processes) that the game has more room not to be disturbed or something. Shrugs. But I ran the benchmark in the game 3 times on each processor setting and I'm always getting the same numbers with 57.3 (50%) and 53.1 (100%). -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
That behaviour there basically looks like high performance mode. Could you also post a screenshot of the power settings you are changing.
White paper on the intel watchdog:
ftp://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/applnots/29227301.pdf
Having an average CPU utilisation at idle is always going to hurt efficiency though, you have a lot of background stuff open. -
http://i62.tinypic.com/2a8rlf7.jpg
I edited previous post just in case it wasn't noticed. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
What are your minimum values at?
-
Minimum Processor State:
On battery = 5%
Plugged in = 5% -
Found out why the 50% thing happens. It's because of the PhysX configuration. Putting PhysX on GPU is just about the same as me reducing the processor to 50%. Putting PhysX on CPU is almost equivalent to using processor at 100%. I had it on Auto at first. So I guess setting it to GPU instead gives better results.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
This is why when testing you need to change one value at a time.
PhysX is a very demanding option. -
It's automatically on. It comes with the driver. It's impossible to turn it off unless you choose to not install it in the driver package. Defaultly it comes set to auto. Forgot all about it until I was just scrolling through the control panel and just managed to connect it to my question.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
PhysX is an option within games. The setting simply chooses if the system attempts to use the CPU or GPU when you turn it on in games.
-
I don't have options like that inside of any pc game that I have unless it is in the steam program somewhere (haven't really explored the steam service though).
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Not all games run it in which case that setting will do nothing.
-
Dude, the thread's over now. Stop being a .
Weird Processor Functionality
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by Shinra358, May 19, 2014.