^ topic title says it all.
-
-
5 = 0 + 1 .
-
raid 0 is faster, but not necessarily better, they do different things, you can find comparisons on google i think. i saw a few articles before i chose to do raid-0.
I think it was the extreme versions of the quads that require too much power for the 9262.
Can you please stop posting new threads on the same topics every day. Please condense your issues into a single thread so that people can actually have an on-going discussion about things.
That way, you create a good informative thread for the whole forum. You have already posted like 5 threads about CPU's with 1 line posts inside.
Thanks. I'm no moderator but I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this. You can always ask questions in response to other posts in your thread ya know, instead of starting new ones. -
raid 5 take 33% of every hd to for backup... so if one of them fail you can still use the other 2... raid 0 is faster but ingame it doesnt give any performance except maybe 5% faster loading...
-
Cool, so I guess raid 5 should work for me, and okay aryantes dont get sand in your snatch its no big deal, this will be my official topic then.
Which raid is better 0 or 5 for performance and where are the QX quad core processors for the NP9262?
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by DivineRiku, Jan 26, 2008.