The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Windows XP Multi Core Config was done correctly?

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by chooch, Aug 1, 2006.

  1. chooch

    chooch Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Is there anyway to tell if the Windows XP Multi Core Config was done correctly? :confused:

    I did the Config as per the instructions but the benchmark (3DMark06) test remained the same.
     
  2. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    how to check:
    1) Make sure the WinXP Hotfix KB896256 is installed
    2) In the Registry:
    a.. Throttle (Key) must be there
    b.. PerfEnablePackageIdle (DWORD) has the value of 1
    3) Boot.ini has the command /usepmtimer in its last line


    thats pretty much it

    -Gophn
     
  3. chooch

    chooch Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    So there are no processes you can check if its working?
     
  4. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    if you look in the Task Manager, under Performance tab, there should be 2 CPUs present, and should split the load of any game or program

    -Gophn
     
  5. chooch

    chooch Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    So how does that relate to Windows XP Multi Core Config?
     
  6. p_boucher

    p_boucher Notebook Evangelist NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    65
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    No there are no processes. The mulmti core thing is only to make sure Windows XP optimally split workload between processors.

    And take note that for 1 program to be multi-threaded is has to be built that way. And there are not much programs that can do this, especially games. The only real applications that can take advantage of multiple cores are video encoding applications. So for the rest, we have to make sure that Windows at least equally split the workload from different processes between the 2 cores (Text editing and unzipping for example).

    So apart from checking your registry entries, there is no way to assume Windows XP is correctly configured. There is no flag anywhere :), apart from checking on what Gophn said. The load on the 2 cpus should be more/less balanced. Fire up intensive tasks and look how it goes.
     
  7. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    p_boucher is correct....

    However, there are certain games at this time (ex. Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion) that will take advantage of the multi cores.

    In any case, you should run Super PI and PCMark to see the scores, if you have read Kilim's 5760 Review, you can compare it to his scores.

    -Gophn
     
  8. WeelyTM

    WeelyTM Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    65
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    don't forget quake 4 w/patch
     
  9. Runner

    Runner Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I just purchased a Dell D820 with T7200 processor. The registry was set fine but the boot.ini file did not have the /usepmtimer. Is there any reason I should not add this to the boot.ini file?
     
  10. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    make sure that you have:

    -The WinXP Hotfix KB896256 installed (it doesnt come with Windows Update)
    -and yes you have to add the /usepmtimer in its last line of the Boot.ini (in order to get the performance to be optimized
     
  11. Runner

    Runner Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The hotfix had been installed by Dell and I have now added the /usepmtimer.
     
  12. donka

    donka Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Where can we download the hotfix?
     
  13. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
  14. donka

    donka Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks. Is this the latest version as it says v3 but I think the MS knowledge base says v4??
     
  15. Gophn

    Gophn NBR Resident Assistant

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    456
    The knowledge base is correct there is a v4.1 but its only for German (DEU) version of Windows XP. I believe that there were some issues in that international version that prompted MS to make another version. I havent heard any issues so far for the current v3 hotfix. Its been pretty rock solid so far for who ever that has done it.
     
  16. donka

    donka Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Gophn, many thanks for your help. It is much appreciated. I did this on my Inspiron 6400 but never really noticed any improvement using Super Pi although my desktop dual core machine had a good improvement. Incidentally, my Inspiron was on battery but with the power mode set to Always On. I'll try it later today on power to see if there is any difference.