^ True, though there's not much of a price difference between 1066 and 1333mhz SODIMMS.
-
-
However if SODIMMs appear at 1600, that will be a whole new story1600 divided by 533 is 3, so it should give you a performance bost, but you may need to get newer BIOS, haven't checked that because I thought it would be a year before we get 1600 (or rather affordable 1600). Service manual (for 570TU at least) seems to suggest 1066 is the limit.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
@varadero
so which one will I use, the 1333 or 1066? Take note I have 2x2GB for both, I have them on hand right now, so don't worry about the cost because I got the 1333 for free. -
At the moment the maximum clock signal from the system board is 1066 megahertz, so both will work but you'll be completely wasting your money on the 1333 - it will just be downclocked to fit into two FSB cycles (ie 1066).
BTW I also heard someone on these forums having trouble getting certain brands of memory to work irrespective of frequency - I think Neil from Kobalt went for Crucial because it was the least trouble, maybe worth going by that? -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Currently, I have the Crucial 1066 2x2GB, and the other one is Samsung 1333 2x2GB. So would it be better to just sell the 1333 MHz? Should I not save it for future use? That is, if ever Clevo releases a BIOS update that will support 1333MHz. The 1333 RAM came from PCMW which sells the M860TU with 1333 RAM.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Someone on the forums also mentioned that even though the 1333 will downclock to 1066, it's timing will be slightly better than the 1066 but not too noticeable, is that true?
-
While faster/better ram can have better timings at lower speeds that slower native ram, in this case, after looking at the specs of both modules, the 1333MHz ram (normally cas 8) will downclock to 1066 cas 7, which is exactly what the 1066MHz ram runs at anyway, so there will be no advantage in this instance, unless you plan on overclocking.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
ahh.. but is cas 8 better than cas 7?
-
Less is better.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
ahh. will the 1333mhz be cas7 when it is downclocked?
-
yes, the 1066 MHz ram runs at cas 7
the 1333 MHz ram runs at EITHER 1333MHz cas8, OR 1066MHz cas7.
So you will see absolutely no difference between the 2. -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Ok, I've used CPU-Z and recorder screenshots of the 1066 and 1333 RAMs. Here are the pics for the 1066:
And for the 1333:
Why do they appear to be different in terms of timing?
Also, in their timing tables why doesn't the 1333 RAM have a 533 MHz column like the 1066 RAM does? -
OK, that is very strange. Have you tried cpuz 1.50?
Otherwise, try pcwizard08 or everest and see if they give you the same readings. -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Yes I just tried cpu-z 1.50 and it gave me the same readings. What is weird in particular?
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
pcwizard gave me the same readings. But the memory tab of cpu-z gives me the same values right?
-
The spd values for the 1333MHz ram are not stock speeds, and it's not running at the cas latencies specified in its documentation
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Oh no, what could be the problem? When you say documentation, is that the pdf file in the samsung website? I've tried every program you've mentioned and they give the same spd values for the 1333MHz RAM.
-
I don't know what the problem is, I suggest using the 1066MHz ram, as currently, the 1333 is running slower, and even if you get it running at stock spd values, it'll be the same speed as the 1066.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Alright. With the 1066MHz RAM, there is no problem with the timing values and all that right?
Will the M860TU MoBo never support 1333MHz RAM even with a BIOS update in the future? -
I think never.....Unless a overclock.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
what are disadvantages of overclocking rams?
-
If you want to get ram over 1066, you must overclock the FSB, so CPU PCIe PCI Frequency will raise too, which may lead to a unstable situation.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
@theriko
ok, I tried using the 1066MHz RAM again and I observed a noticeable decrease in startup time which is really explains that this is faster.
Based on the pictures I've posted in the previous page, are the SPD values of the 1066MHz RAM normal? Why do they have a 610MHz column if they are only 1066MHz RAM? And are the CAS normal values? -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
@theriko
here is the datasheet for the 1066mhz but I don't know how to compare: http://download.micron.com/pdf/datasheets/modules/ddr3/JTF16c_256_512x64ay.pdf
I hope you can help me, thanks. -
-
The CPU's FSB would have to be at 1333MHz as well, for the RAM to run at 1333MHz.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
@duane16
Well, do you have any ideas on the problem regarding the unusual timings of the RAM? It's downclocked to 1066 but the latencies are still high which is not right IMO. -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
@5482741
I see that you also have a 4GB 1333MHz RAM. Can you post the memory and spd tab of your laptop using cpu-z 1.50? I have to compare it with mine. Thanks. -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
How much would 2x2GB Samsung 1333MHz RAMS cost these days? Are there any laptops that support these RAMs natively?
-
-
.
-
Duane -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Can anyone please post their CPUZ screenshots of the memory and SPD tab of those who have 1333 MHz memory installed in their M860TU? I think this would be people who bought from PCMW and EUROCOM and other resellers who offer the 1333. Thanks!
-
-
When I get time I need to look at the ratio's supported by the chipset, however only a 1:2 ratio is currently used..
So my fast 1333Mhz memory is running at 10666Mhz. They are running at tight timings of 8-8-8-20.
The question is if 10666Mhz memory is available capable of running the same timing??
Either way I'm still extremely happy with the performance!!
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Thanks for the pic EDGEEnthusiast!
m860tu support for more than 4gb ram
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by kevindd992002, Jan 30, 2009.