my 5793 Scores and story ....

First off i want to Thanks Xotic and Sager for all their Help getting this Laptop.

The Story

I ordered a 5792 in Dec 28th with these specs.

T7700 CPU
80 Gig HDD
8800 GPU
4 Gig of Ram
Vista Premium 64
and other standard crap

ok between the time when it was shipped from Sager to me.
Xotic announced the release of the Penryn CPU and the 5793 Case upgrades.

well being the same price point i contacted Xotic about swapping my CPU for the T9300. which they were more then happy to do. The contacted Sager and their Tech talked to me about what i want.

I really just wanted the new CPU T9300. but why there i asked if they could do the fan firmware update and upgrade the case to 5793. they didnt see a problem. They issued the RMA and i sent the laptop in. I had the laptop in my hands less then a week. been in a hurry to send the laptop in i forgot to pull out my Call of Duty 4 dvd from the player. i emailed Allen at Sager Asap soon as i knew about it and he said no problem.


Sager would just Swap over to the new case. my HDD, Ram and video card and add the new CPU. SWEET....

Well tonight the 5793 came back to me from UPS.
First thing i did was install my Western Digital 320Ggig HDD. i imaged the 80 gig onto the 320 with Trueimage 11 ( great program).

My new specs are as follows.
T9300 CPU
8800 GPU
4 gig Ram
320 iGig HDD
Vista Prem 64

and other standard crap

ok the Scores.

Before my WEI score was 4.8

here is is now.


HDD Scores from HD Tune
its a Western Digital 320iGig HDD



the 3dmark06 score


Now i dont know why the 3dmark05 score is so big but here it is.



I am very happy with the service from Xotic and Sager.

2 Thumbs up!!:smile:

 

Congrats

Please do some Crysis benchmarks using the Crysis Benchmark Tool hehe

oh and a typo in your system specs, unless you really do have 320 gigs ram

 

fixed it.

heading to do Crysis Bench now

 

Crysis Benchmarks.

I did two different runs.

Run #1

2/1/2008 11:52:43 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1280x1024, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 96.11s, Average FPS: 20.81
Min FPS: 14.22 at frame 139, Max FPS: 27.77 at frame 995
Average Tri/Sec: 19762012, Tri/Frame: 949655
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.97
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 90.62s, Average FPS: 22.07
Min FPS: 14.22 at frame 139, Max FPS: 27.77 at frame 995
Average Tri/Sec: 21149128, Tri/Frame: 958308
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 90.36s, Average FPS: 22.13
Min FPS: 14.22 at frame 139, Max FPS: 27.77 at frame 995
Average Tri/Sec: 21192818, Tri/Frame: 957538
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Beginning Run #2 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1280x1024, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 97.15s, Average FPS: 20.59
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 1321, Max FPS: 27.44 at frame 994
Average Tri/Sec: 19560014, Tri/Frame: 950090
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 93.23s, Average FPS: 21.45
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 1321, Max FPS: 27.44 at frame 994
Average Tri/Sec: 20559244, Tri/Frame: 958359
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 92.58s, Average FPS: 21.60
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 1321, Max FPS: 27.44 at frame 994
Average Tri/Sec: 20724966, Tri/Frame: 959352
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.96
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2/1/2008 11:52:43 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 22.1
Run #2- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.525



Run #2

2/2/2008 12:06:03 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 75.35s, Average FPS: 26.54
Min FPS: 23.36 at frame 1963, Max FPS: 40.17 at frame 121
Average Tri/Sec: 22572940, Tri/Frame: 850483
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.08
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 60.62s, Average FPS: 32.99
Min FPS: 23.36 at frame 1963, Max FPS: 47.24 at frame 79
Average Tri/Sec: 28305980, Tri/Frame: 857972
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 61.23s, Average FPS: 32.66
Min FPS: 23.36 at frame 1963, Max FPS: 47.61 at frame 85
Average Tri/Sec: 28029732, Tri/Frame: 858137
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Beginning Run #2 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 75.25s, Average FPS: 26.58
Min FPS: 24.46 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 39.96 at frame 121
Average Tri/Sec: 22597450, Tri/Frame: 850251
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.08
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 60.62s, Average FPS: 32.99
Min FPS: 24.46 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 46.78 at frame 67
Average Tri/Sec: 28312094, Tri/Frame: 858092
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 60.60s, Average FPS: 33.00
Min FPS: 24.46 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 47.15 at frame 71
Average Tri/Sec: 28320142, Tri/Frame: 858087
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.07
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2/2/2008 12:06:03 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.825
Run #2- DX10 1900x1200 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.995

 

Reran 3Dmark06 after i did some Vista tweaks with Winbubble.

 

Mecha,

can you do a wPrime benchmark (for multi-core CPUs) for me?

i want to see how your CPU compares to others. Please post a snapshot.

Thanks.

 

@Gophn

just tried [email protected]

 

Both are...freaking fast!

 

thanks for the benches guys, I will update the wPrime Hall of Fame soon.

Those scores are the top for all the other mobile CPU scores.

 

pretty cool what'd the 9500 do?

 

Beg to differ if only slightly. Please see: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=2929128#post2929128

 

That's because it's the T9500, while he had a T9300.

 

Not to belabor the point but for accuracy's sake, the statement reads"These scores are top for all the other mobile CPU scores". If that means that those scores are the best so far for mobile CPU's then my statement is correct. If there is another meaning, thenI stand corrected. Thanks

 

ok fine you got a higher score. who gives a flip.

 

People who actually care about performance give a flip
I don`t get your hostile reply towards ogun.

 

Dude, it's 0.015 seconds difference.
Does it really matter when you're gaming?

Dan

 

Every bit counts. Does 1 fps make a difference in a game like crysis? hell yea!
As stated, EVERY BIT counts.

 

With the price differences between T9300 vs. T9500 I thought the T9500 would give more then 0.015 seconds in performance…..

 

Well...okay...but it's still fifteen thousandths of a second (15/1000). I thought games like crysis were bottlenecked by the video card?

Oh well, that's enough from me.
Dan

 

Sorry, I didn't mean to rain on your parade.

 

no hostility here bud.
for the price different between the T9500 and T9300 that fraction on a performance boost isnt worth it.

he was so concerned that gophn had mistated something...
Who really cares.

Not here to make a top of a performance list or a populatity contest.

 

you didnt rain on my parade at all.
i could care less what your Scores are.
im not using your box so to me doesnt matter.

 

If it's faster it's faster.

 

I think the record holder is Justin -- http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=2854596&postcount=83

with the score of 30.171 / 961.493 --

http://forum.notebookreview.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=13950&d=1199914170

 

Amen brotha.

 

Davdob, that's an engineering sample, which means it's not going to be on the retail market.

 

why is the T9500 only that little bit faster? is it a pure marketingcase?

 

Ogun is also using an engineering sample CPU.

http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=2846357&postcount=27

 

ES CPUs should not enter any comparison tables. The T9500 works at 2.6 Ghz, which is 100 Mhz more than a T9300, therefore the little difference between them.

 

i remember 133 mhz vs 266 made a whole lot of difference

 

Could we get back on topic here please? You all have very respectable laptops, let's just leave it at that and move on.