185.20 seems to still be one of the best ones around. for benching and gaming.
-
how do you flash a card with higher voltage?
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
does this help you.
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=388335 -
I just got some nice results from overclocking. I used nvidia system tools to raise the clocks to 620/925/1550 (core/memory/shader). I also have rivatuner installed, i'm not sure if it affects the results somehow. I have the CCC 2.21 config as well, but i guess the benchmarking tool overrides the config's settings.
7/6/2009 6:58:04 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 96.86s, Average FPS: 20.65
Min FPS: 16.41 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 28.25 at frame 998
Average Tri/Sec: -16883564, Tri/Frame: -817713
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.12
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 87.76s, Average FPS: 22.79
Min FPS: 16.37 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 28.25 at frame 998
Average Tri/Sec: -18232270, Tri/Frame: -800023
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.15
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 87.60s, Average FPS: 22.83
Min FPS: 16.37 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 28.54 at frame 993
Average Tri/Sec: -18265140, Tri/Frame: -800033
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.15
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
7/6/2009 6:58:04 PM - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 22.81 -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
what is your system specs. it seems alot higher then mines.
-
Running it with the current game settings (ccc lvl 5 + TOD) didn't do a thing.
7/6/2009 7:11:15 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Custom
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=
Texture=
ObjectDetail=
Sound=
Shadows=
Water=
Physics=
Particles=
Shading=
PostProcessing=
GameEffects=
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 96.52s, Average FPS: 20.72
Min FPS: 16.85 at frame 1951, Max FPS: 28.59 at frame 997
Average Tri/Sec: -16939490, Tri/Frame: -817519
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.12
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 87.47s, Average FPS: 22.86
Min FPS: 16.68 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 28.59 at frame 997
Average Tri/Sec: -18307776, Tri/Frame: -800698
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.14
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 88.01s, Average FPS: 22.73
Min FPS: 16.53 at frame 1933, Max FPS: 28.59 at frame 997
Average Tri/Sec: -18192366, Tri/Frame: -800533
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.15
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
7/6/2009 7:11:15 PM - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 22.795 -
np8662
gtx260m
p9700
4gb ram -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
ok i just saw your res.
and your still using the same voltage correct. -
i haven't changed the voltage, maybe the system changes it automanically
i just ran it at 640/950/1600
Global Game Quality: Custom
Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 23.425 -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
woah nice. i had to overvolt mine in order to get to those clocks.
-
what clock ratio is best for 260m?
is there a linear relationship between the clocks? -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
the core must be multipled by 2.5 to get the shader.
-
should the memory clock be related to other clocks in any way?
also is there a way to see the voltage of your card? -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
i know when you take out the bios from gpu-z and read it, it will tell you everything but you should be at 1v if you didn't touch anything.
i'm not sure about the memory. -
well ccc makes a difference, here's what happens when its uninstalled at 620/1550/925 clocks:
7/8/2009 7:31:21 PM - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 18.94 -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
what is ccc?
i'm thinking catalst control center -
it is a custom config for crysis
http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=23117 -
does reducing the clocks improve battery life, or does the card downclock automatically when not gaming?
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
That's correct. The card will downclock itself when not gaming.
-
what overvolt would you recommend? 1.05v? what voltage is standard?
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
The factory voltage is 1v, which should be enough to push the card to 600/1500/900. Use 1.05v if you want to push a bit higher.
-
do higher voltages than 1.05 provide better results?
at stock voltage 640/1600/950 i can run three benchmarking loops without the game crashing. what clocks should i expect with 1.05 v? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Three loops of what benchmark? What were the max temperatures during those benchmarks? You should stress test those clocks first for stability, then you can benchmark them after.
You have two choices: Furmark with ATITool artifact scanner, or OCCT. -
the test_gpu benchmark in the crysis benchmarking tool. i'll test it for stability like you said sometime too. what about the voltage though? any reason to go higher than 1.05?
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
1.05v is the maximum voltage allowed by the GPU.
-
is that determined by hardware? -
It is what it is, basically. The PSU can only give so much juice, so limits are in place.
-
i may be getting too technical, but is the amperage always constant?
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Amperage rises with load.
-
should i change the voltage to back to standard when not gaming?
would it even be better to undervolt? if so, how much? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Your GPU will switch to it's lower levels when you're not gaming, so there is no need to lower the voltage of the highest level if you are not gaming.
I have compiled a set of clocks that are guaranteed stable for any G92. I have adjusted the lower level voltages to take into account GPU manufacturing quality.
Extra: 600/1500/900 @ 1v, 620/1550/930 @ 1.05v, 640/1600/950 @ 1.05v
3D: 400/800/300 @ 0.8v
Throttle: 300/600/300 @ 0.75v
2D: 160/320/80 @ 0.7v -
Would 600/1500/900 be perfectly stable on my 9800M GT? I thougt you had to increase the voltage with those clocks?
How much colder would the card go if I reduce the voltage to 1v from 1.05v, with the same clocks and if it would be stable? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Try it first before you ask me.
At the same clocks, a lower voltage will yield a lower thermal signature. Specifically how much colder it will be is entirely up to you to find out. -
some people undervolt their gpu. whats the point of that, if the card downclocks automatically when not gaming?
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
We undervolt for the same reason we undervolt our CPU's: to minimize the amount of excess power needed to power the card at those clocks, and to lower temperatures.
-
Why post something you guarantee will work when you clearly can not?
-
ok, so i'll use overvolt for gaming and undervolt for battery life. how long does changing the voltage take? as long as it takes to restart the computer?
also, does overvolting the cpu increase performance? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
-
Changing the voltage doesn`t take that long. If you are new to this, I recommend you to search for some threads regarding this theme.
Overvolting the cpu doesn`t make any sense, I think. The cpu`s are "overvolted" from the factory because it has a safe margin you might say. This is why we can undervolt it. -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Overclocking boosts performance. Overvolting doesn't. Be careful when using those two terms. -
i see,
does overvolting the processor allow to reach higher clocks? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
If the CPU vcore is accessible, then yes.
-
My core is pretty lame, anything past 630/1575 for gaming becomes unstable. It's also driver dependent, like I can't get 3dmark06 to finish at 650/1650 with these hacked 186.24 drivers, but 186.03 would do ok. I can keep 1000 memory for most games, but I'll drop to ~980 for crysis.
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Have you tried 650/1625/950 @ 1.05v?
-
Anything past 630 on the core is unstable. The only reason I can get 650 in 3dmark is because, well, it's 3dmark. 1625 shader for the 1:2.5 ratio doesn't make a difference.
I've been trying to run 3dmark06 on 186.24 and it's just a bad driver. I ran Crysis just fine at 630/1000/1575, but they crashed in 3dmarkDoing a stock run with memory at 950 to compare to what I think was 185.85, 12775 marks.
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Damn, your card really does suck then, haha.
-
Tell me about it, lol
-
i think gtx260m is a bit better when it comes to overclocking
when I turned the core up to 640 with standard voltage i could run thee benchmark_gpu loops without crashing, and while i was playing, crysis only crashed once. -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Did you happen to see at what temperature did Crysis crash?
-
no, but there was unusually hot to the touch
(besides the hard drive, but that's another story)
overclocking 260m
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by balmore, May 13, 2009.