The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Proven by notebookcheck:F13 premium screen is worse than its predecessor

    Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by LTN184HT, Nov 14, 2010.

  1. LTN184HT

    LTN184HT Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    LTN184HT, Nov 14, 2010
    #1
  2. Tinderbox (UK)

    Tinderbox (UK) BAKED BEAN KING

    Reputations:
    4,745
    Messages:
    8,513
    Likes Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    431
    You need to provide an english translation of those websites, babel fish is a online translator.
     
    Tinderbox (UK), Nov 14, 2010
    #2
  3. Hayte

    Hayte Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    450
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Use google chrome -> auto translate. :)

    The thing about brightness uniformity though is that it varies from screen to screen. It looks like the review model they had was particularly bad but otherwise gives no indication that it is a different screen. Until they post up an english language review its hard to tell if its a different screen with an anti glare coating or if its the same type of matte screen inherited from the F12.
     
    Hayte, Nov 14, 2010
    #3