Does anyone have a photo with these two models next to each other? Id really like to see how they look
Thanks in advance
Ant
-
Here ya go. Not the best pic, but better than nothin'.
Attached Files:
-
-
great thanks SoundsGood.... SR seems to have a better screen? Or is it the FW Eco screen
-
It's the Eco screen in this pic. Pretty nasty, eh?
-
Beautiful piece of art of Sony VAIO
-
yea.... i would hope that since i have the SR coming anyday now, it would at least match the FW Dual Lamp (or in USA the hi colour) screen
-
It's not that bad. Honestly, it doesn't even look that bad in real life. I was worried at first the screen would be horrible but after seeing it in person, the colours are vibrant and crisp. Plus, you can always tweak colour balance in the ATI menu. You haven't seen bad until you've seen my Toshiba screen.
-
Wolf04 : Considering the above photo i should expect that my SR will have a nice screen then right ?
-
Another question guys
FW has the 3470 with 256mb and the SR with 128mb
That does not mean the performance will be worse right? I figure FW has 256 because it needs more to run at the higher resolution right? -
I guess so. To be honest, the Sony Store here in Canada don't even have the SR on display so I couldn't compare them but I don't see why it wouldn't have a nice screen.
Depends on what gaming you do.
For example, the new Call of Duty: World at War game requires at least 256 MB of vRAM. I don't know how it will run on 128 MB but I guess the difference here is between being able to run the game (even on bare minimum detail and resolution) versus not being able to run it at all. -
or if you are willing to play such a game at very low settings
Guess i will be playing that on my desktop
I will have the SR Tomorrow
SR vs FW?
Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by AntonisCy, Aug 18, 2008.
