The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    What is your SZ3xx Windows Experience Index?

    Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by leewalk, Jan 12, 2007.

  1. leewalk

    leewalk Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Windows Vista includes a "Windows Experience Index" that rates the performance of a computer. Does anyone have Vista on a SZ3xx that could share their Index?

    It looks like this (from my Dell):

    Processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1700MHz 3.5
    Memory (RAM) 2.00 GB 4.1
    Graphics ATI MOBILITY RADEON 9600 PRO TURBO 3.8
    Gaming graphics 255 MB Total available graphics memory 3.5
    Primary hard disk 10GB Free (56GB Total) 4.3

    Thanks, Lee
     
  2. leewalk

    leewalk Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    (bump)
    Anyone running Vista?
     
  3. BaNZ

    BaNZ Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yup but on vmware + external hdd.

    Very poor performance :p I don't want to replace my current OS yet because imho they still need to work on Vista a bit more.
     
  4. grisjuan

    grisjuan Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    31
    On my SZ110B in "speed" mode I get 3.2 overall - the limiting component is the graphics.

    It used to be 3.3, but the other day, Vista decided there had been a hardware change (when there had not been) and recalculated it down to 3.2.