The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Why does my Vaio SA i7-2620M show 4 cores?

    Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by najibkassis, Jul 12, 2011.

  1. najibkassis

    najibkassis Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Take a look at this picture: [​IMG]
     
  2. jdimitri

    jdimitri Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hyper threading =)
     
  3. Brianho1337

    Brianho1337 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    More specifically, the i7-2620M (and most other new dual core processors) have 2 virtual cores in addition to the 2 physical cores they have originally. This technically makes it a 4 core processor but is still more accurately described as a 2 core since there aren't many applications that utilizes hyper threading...
     
  4. Achusaysblessyou

    Achusaysblessyou eecs geek ftw :D

    Reputations:
    334
    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Yes, what they say before. Actually most new mid to high end processors will have Hyper-Threading. Some lower end processors wont. Some i3's dont have them as well as the new Sandy Bridge Pentiums... which confuse the heck out of me.
     
  5. shurcooL

    shurcooL Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    68
    Messages:
    745
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    As someone who has owned computers with and without Hyper-Threading (and ran some benchmarks to see how useful it is), I can say it's a really good thing.

    For heavy multi-threaded tasks, it can improve performance by around 30% or so (vs. having it disabled).
     
  6. anytimer

    anytimer Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    302
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    101
    LOL The dual Xeon quad core servers I work with (two physical processors, each quad core) show 16 CPUs. :D Task Manager looks awful.
     
  7. Generic User #2

    Generic User #2 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    since when did applications need to support hyperthreading? even OSes don't need to be aware of hyper threading for it to work(although the system is smarter about CPU allocation if it is).
     
  8. anytimer

    anytimer Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    302
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    101
    If an application only uses one thread to do all its processing, multiple cores and/or hyper threading will not produce any performance benefit for that app. An OS typically spawns multiple threads.
     
  9. Generic User #2

    Generic User #2 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i didn't say any of that. He said that an applications needs to support hyperthreading in order to use those hyperthreads.

    I'm saying that as long as the app supports multi-threading, it will use them.
     
  10. anytimer

    anytimer Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    302
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    101
    :cool: No arguments there. Hope this discussion has cleared things up for the OP. :)
    Hyperthreading == good.
    Multiple cores == even better.
    Multiple cores + hyperthreading == awesome.