The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Why is my ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 playing at 5 FPS?

    Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by Biggamer3, Dec 30, 2008.

  1. Biggamer3

    Biggamer3 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    What the hell Sony Tech support is no help at all, why is red Alert 3 playing at 5 measly frames per second on my FW 2.4 Ghz computer with this gaming card?
     
  2. ascariss

    ascariss Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    156
    Messages:
    1,287
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    what settings are you using in the game?
     
  3. Biggamer3

    Biggamer3 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Graphics on Ultra High, when i put them at low it plays at 30FPS but the graphics are bad
     
  4. SirRobin

    SirRobin Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    62
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Ultra High ist too much for that gpu :) You`ll have to reduce the settings or the resolution, or live with 5 frames per second.
     
  5. Biggamer3

    Biggamer3 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Can anyone with similar settings as mine confirm if their games are playing well?
     
  6. Itchy-

    Itchy- Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I installed Fallout 3 on my FW (2.26ghz, 4gb ram, hd 3650) a couple of days ago and am playing it on "high" quality settings with AA and AF off at 1920x1080 with no noticeable hiccups...not sure of the exact fps's (haven't tested in-game), but I have so far not experienced any appreciable lag or slow downs -

    Fallout 3 system requirements -

    Red Alert 3 system requirements -

    What kind of fps's do you get when you ratchet down the settings just a tad? Do you have AA and AF enabled? What resolution are you playing on? Do you have "performance" enabled in your control center and not have it set it to "high quality?
     
  7. Biggamer3

    Biggamer3 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Dont know what AA and AF mean.

    When i put the setting on ultra high it was moving at a snails pace, and was unplayable but it did look gorgeous. when i lowered it to medium it didnt look as good but played fine.
     
  8. Itchy-

    Itchy- Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    AF = anisotropic filtering
    AA = anti-aliasing

    These settings are adjustable through one of the game menus (I couldn't imagine red alert 3 wouldn't aa and af - I haven't played a game in 4-5 years that hasn't) and are basically just quality settings...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aliasing
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropic_filtering

    The higher the multiplier the more taxing on your gpu, but the better the quality - you can though still set your overall quality setting to "high" and turn both AA and AF off.

    ...look in the game menus and turn those 2 off and report back.
     
  9. Biggamer3

    Biggamer3 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    AA i turned off dont remember about AF though.

    but 5 FPS what the hell?

    is that really normal?

    i would love for you to try Red Alert and let me know how that went :)
     
  10. marciobda

    marciobda Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    maybe the powerplay setting (in the catalyst control panel) is on max battery life.
     
  11. panzer06

    panzer06 His Imperial Majesty

    Reputations:
    358
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Yes, it's normal, the Mobile HD3650 is a mid-level laptop GPU. Only a few laptops have the ATI Mobile HD 3870 (the Alienware M17 comes to mind) but they cost twice as much (or more) than the FW290 and most don't even have Blu-Ray. I bought this Sony just for games when I am on the road and it works well as long as you don't get too crazy with the graphics settings. I find mid-high works well for most. I also do not enable AA or AF. So you get a few little jaggies; in the heat of battle I don't notice.

    When I want full graphics power, I use a full desktop with a full desktop ATI HD 4870. -- Can't carry that around with me tho!

    Cheers,
     
  12. casso11

    casso11 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5

    hey ... i recently bought a sony fw21z with similar specs like you

    (Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 (2.53 GHz) - 4096 MB DDR2 - 500 GB - 16.4" WUXGA (1920x1080) - ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 - Blu-ray writer - 32-bit vista - etc.)

    i also get low fps when trying to play games (nfs undercover runs @ ca. 7-12 fps while playing at 1024x768 at low settings) .. i even went as far as trying the good old nfs underground 2 and cant make it run well at 800x600, still choppy as hell ...

    ive looked around the forums and all the advices go on about updating drivers, checking catalyst settings or defragmenting the hdd ... ive only had the computer for a couple of weeks, have the latest drivers and have tried everything i could think of ... still hanging on, tho, i bet its just some trivial thing - as people with the same graphics card but different manufacturer/model dont seem to be experiencing any problems ... maybe its got something to do with vista, anyone tried installing XP on their machine to see if the performance improves??

    other than that, the computer is just amazing ...
     
  13. panzer06

    panzer06 His Imperial Majesty

    Reputations:
    358
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I don't know why you are seeing these issues. I have a FW290 CTO 2.26 version with 64bit Vista, 4GB Ram (Kingston HyperX) and 320GB 5400 HD. I have the following games installed:

    Company of Heroes
    Civ IV
    AOE 3
    Red Alert 3
    Titan's Quest Immortal Throne
    Lord of the Rings BFME2

    All work well @ 1920x1080 with Med-High (depends on the game) settings. No jumpiness at all. I understand none of these are FPS games and don't require massive GPU power. The Sony is much better than my Macbook Pro with the nVidia 8600 running Vista 32bit.

    Cheers,
     
  14. Raenydyne

    Raenydyne Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Ha, the misconception of needing all the extras turned on strikes again. Let me tell you, I have literally played every popular game since Doom and have went back to replay some of these games occasionally. In some instances, filtering does not make anything better, but is just an addition "because you can."
    I also notice another useless bar that increases the draw distance beyond anything you will ever need for any reason.
    And lastly maybe it's my aging eyes, but stuff is easier to see (especially text and dialog) when the resolution is lower or 'no higher than' 1200x800.
    I almost didn't buy a laptop with this card when I saw the title of the thread, but now I am breathing again.
     
  15. panzer06

    panzer06 His Imperial Majesty

    Reputations:
    358
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Indeed, play with reasonable settings and you will be just fine.

    BTW, which system did you or are you thinking of buying?

    Cheers,
     
  16. Wolf04

    Wolf04 Sony Fanatic

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I don't know if there is anything wrong with the drivers or the hardware but on my HD 3470, C&C: Red Alert 3 plays around high 20s to low 30s fps with Medium settings on at a resolution of 1280x720 and no AA, so I don't see why the HD3650 couldn't handle the game at ultra high settings and the same resolution, though increasing the resolution and turning on AA is pushing it.
     
  17. panzer06

    panzer06 His Imperial Majesty

    Reputations:
    358
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Without installing modded drivers my FW290 only has 1920x1080, 1024x768 & 800x600. I imagine others who do not wish to use modded drivers will stick with the native resolution, which at 1920x1080 will not handle Ultra high on any game I am aware of. The 3650 is good but not great. The mobile 3870 and the new mobile 4850 are supposed to provide significantly better performance. Perhaps a future FW will have one of these more powerful GPUs.

    Cheers,