The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Z21 & TMPGenc 4.0 Xpress = slower than SZ491

    Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by ric9887, Dec 6, 2008.

  1. ric9887

    ric9887 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I have been running through some DIVX-MP4 transcodes on a Z21VN and comparing them to the same running on my SZ491 which I intend to retire and discovered that the performance of TMPGEnc Xpress 4 is very much compromised on the Z - although at the moment, I can not determine what is causing the degredation. An encode on the SZ is taking ~30 mins and 1h30m on the Z.

    I am using TMPGenc 4.0 Xpress 4.6.3.267 and initially wanted to check out the CUDA enhancements which the Z equiped 9300M GS should support. I have later found out that due to Sony's hacking togeather of Intel/Nvidia drivers to enable the on-the-fly Stamina/Speed switch - I am unable to upgrade the Nvidia drivers to support CUDA but back to the performance problem.

    Both SZ and Z are running roughly the same software. I havent rebuild Vista on the Z, but I have made sure ffdshow, TMPGEnc, BitDefender are all the same.

    On paper the Z should way outperform the SZ. Indeed Everest performance tests support this, showing higher performance for HD, memory, CPU in the Z.

    TMPGEnc on the SZ will run at 89-94% CPU for 100% of the time from the moment I start an encode until the encode is finished. On the Z, it will run the CPU at approx 55%. Process Explorer shows the remaining CPU as System Idle Process. Settings in TMPGEnc are identical. I have checked that the Performce power profile is enabled as is the Performance Fan profile.

    CPU-Z (1.49) does show the occasional flip from 9.5x to 10x cpu mulitplier on the Z, but I am not I trust it. The SZ is solid at 13x. I realise the CPU's are different and suppport differnet Intel features - but still of some interest.

    I will reinstall Vista / drivers on the Z and start with a clean system when I have some time, but I would have expected to see what is causing the slowdown. The laptop feels responsive doing everything else, so it may just be a fault in TMPGEnc.

    Regards
    Rich
     
  2. InfyMcGirk

    InfyMcGirk while(!(succeed=try()));

    Reputations:
    110
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    That's odd. I think some of the power settings on the Z throttle the CPU, so maybe that might be worth investigating? I do a bit of divx encoding using Gordian Knot and find my Z to be much quicker than my desktop (an Athlon 64 3000+ from a few years back).