The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    which processor?

    Discussion in 'VAIO / Sony' started by AntonisCy, Jul 27, 2008.

  1. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    is better on a laptop?

    T9400 or P8400?
     
  2. SoundsGood

    SoundsGood Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    188
    Messages:
    3,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Define "better." ;)
     
  3. Prasad

    Prasad NBR Reviewer 1337 NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,804
    Messages:
    4,956
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    106
    The pros and cons are obvious. But the choice is yours. :)
     
  4. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    what are the pros and cons of each then :)

    Which one can handle more pressure... Dont care about power consumption or price
     
  5. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    What kind of applications do you intend on running?

    If you're doing a lot of video editing, encoding/decoding or maths applications the T9400 will perform a bit better.

    P8400 will stay cooler though and will do common tasks and gaming just as quick.
     
  6. Prasad

    Prasad NBR Reviewer 1337 NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,804
    Messages:
    4,956
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Intel® P8400 45nm "Montevina" Core™2 Duo 2.26GHz w/ 3MB L2 On-die cache - 1066MHz FSB 25 watt

    ^^ more power saving, cheaper - slower, smaller cache

    vs.

    Intel® T9400 45nm "Montevina" Core™2 Duo 2.53GHz w/ 6MB L2 On-die cache - 1066MHz FSB 35 watt

    ^^ faster, larger cache - more power consuming, more expensive
     
  7. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    which one would you recommend for daily internet browsing, frequent movie viewing and occasionally game playing.

    im really hoping for the P8400
     
  8. Prasad

    Prasad NBR Reviewer 1337 NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,804
    Messages:
    4,956
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    106
    What games are we talking about here ? :)
     
  9. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    upcoming fifa 09, maybe gta 4 when it comes out on pc... CoD5 on lower settings?
     
  10. Hinduemperior

    Hinduemperior Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    then get the one in the middle P8600. Just worried about CoD5, may need the T9400 to give the HD3650 a boost.
     
  11. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    only model that comes with the 3650 is the T9400
     
  12. Hinduemperior

    Hinduemperior Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    then if your seriously about getting good gaming quality get that. 3650 infinitely better than intel graphics card for gaming and good hd quality movies.
     
  13. AmbitiousEd

    AmbitiousEd Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Which laptop are we talking about here?

    Anyways, I'm pretty sure you'll be able to run COD5 on medium or low settings. COD5 uses the same engine as COD4 (treyarch always copies IWs work). And I can run COD4 on my old ass rig (which is a desktop, 2x512mb of memory, 4200+X2 socket 939, and X800XL) on medium setting at 1280x1024.
     
  14. Hinduemperior

    Hinduemperior Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I think its the premium version in Europe. in the US you replace the 3650 with the 3470 and you have that model.
     
  15. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    I think the bottleneck will be the GPU, not the CPU.

    P8400 will be more than enough for HD3650.

    BenQ ships a laptop with 8600M GT powered by L7500. Which is enough for that GPU.
     
  16. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    yes im talking about the FW11ZU
     
  17. tdx

    tdx Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Has anyone measured the real-world differences in battery life between a 25W CPU and a 35W one? Would they be important or negligible?
     
  18. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Actually, I did some reading up and I would ignore what i wrote above.

    I do not know what CPU you need for optimal gaming with HD3650.
     
  19. AntonisCy

    AntonisCy Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    3650 is not available with the P8400 anyway
     
  20. AmbitiousEd

    AmbitiousEd Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Um, I would just about say that the GPU is the bottleneck PhilFlow. Honestly, people making desktop gaming rigs don't even need better than a 2.6ghz core 2 duo to run crazy graphics cards like dual HD4870s in crossfire without bottlenecking. CPU's have very little effect on gaming performance. The ONLY time CPUs have will effect gaming is if you turn everything to its lowest setting and run at lowest resolution, in which case, the game is in pure speed mode, and the CPU will have use (but seriously, in pure speed mode, you get like 500+ Fps anyways regardless of what CPU you have).

    BOttom Line:
    GPUs bottleneck CPUs for almost every situation.
     
  21. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    That's what I thought too Ed, untill I saw these results:

    World in Conflict.
    Acer with T9400 and 9600M GT 44 fps
    Acer with P8600 and 9600M GT 40 fps
    http://www.notebookjournal.de/tests/613/2
     
  22. AmbitiousEd

    AmbitiousEd Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Perhaps that is an anomoly? There are lots of variables when testing FPS, especially the settings that it was on (which shouldn't be that high considering how demanding world in conflict is). The lower the settings, the more effect the CPU has on the FPS.