I have been using WinRAR for ages as I have an unlimited company license.
Now I keep seing some programs like DDU for example or some drivers packaged using 7-ZIP and was wondering, is it better than WinRAR?
Shall I switch to it or shall I stay on WinRAR which has never failed me?
-
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
-
toughasnails Toughbook Moderator Moderator
I have not used WinRAR for years since it run out. I started using 7-ZIP after that and really never had a problem. If you have been using WinRAR this long and it's worked good for you then I would stay with it.
Papusan and Spartan@HIDevolution like this. -
I have been using 7-Zip because it allow encryption of files. Don't know if WinRAR can do that.
-
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
well with WinRAR I can set a password on the ZIP/RAR archive, isn't that the same? -
StormJumper Notebook Virtuoso
I had no problem with 7zip I used WinZip before and since 7zip was free it was a better alternative and now with 7zip v16 update. It still functions and work fine for my everyday needs. I like that it has alot of features to use and configure with.
-
I use 7-zip because it's free and does what I need it to do...
Primes and killkenny1 like this. -
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
Same. -
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
I understand, but free or not doesn't matter to me since I have a lifetime license, but what I wanted to know is functionality, UI, speed, etc. -
I prefer WinRAR. 7zip requires a few extra clicks to get things done and I love the fact I can be lazy and just double click something in an archive and WinRAR will temporarily extract it so I can check it out while I have to extract the archive in 7zip.
Spartan@HIDevolution likes this. -
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
yeah I remember that while using 7-Zip once, it required a few extra clicks and I am the laziest person on the planet. Thanks for reminding me about thatEthrem likes this. -
I was a long time winzip user before WinRAR and I find WinRAR to be the most polished. And I'm lazy as well. I get really irritated when I have to extract an archive when all I want to do is install whatever is archived and then delete the archive. That makes 7zip a no go for me.Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
-
Windows built in unzip works fine for me for 90% of things I use it for. Just that if something is .rar or other extension that Windows doesn't have built in, 7-zip comes in handy. Unless you're a power zip user I don't see a lot of differences between the two. I used to love WinZip but just never seen a need for such a program since the last 7-8 years at least.
-
Kaze No Tamashii Notebook Evangelist
winrar's free trial is supposed to run out?
-
Spartan@HIDevolution Company Representative
yes in 40 days, It'll still work but with a nag screenKaze No Tamashii likes this. -
I like 7-zip because I hate the archaic look of WinRAR. 7-Zip's GUI seems cleaner and I can set up easily context menus. Perhaps it's possible on winrar but I don't care to check.
-
I use 7-zip, and haven't looked back. I like that I can open .iso's and look inside of .exe's. Not sure if winzip can do that, I haven't used it in a long time.
HTWingNut likes this. -
WinRAR has ISO support as well. Never tried it on an exe.Spartan@HIDevolution likes this.
-
killkenny1 Too weird to live, too rare to die.
And that's the reason I quit on WinRAR. Nag screen would break my mod installing flow...
But the downside of 7zip, like already mentioned here, no file previews inside archive. You have to extract before opening files. Granted they work exactly like extraction, but still, it's kinda more convenient. -
saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate
File preview is nice, but it's not nearly enough to convince me to pay money for WinRAR. If WinRAR was $10-15 I'd consider it, but $30 is far too much. 7-Zip does everything I need otherwise.
Jarhead and alexhawker like this.
7-Zip vs Winrar
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Spartan@HIDevolution, May 21, 2016.