After four hours the Vista defragmenter was still defragmenting the hard drive. Why is it taking to long?
OS is vista ultimate.
-
It could be a normal thing...Reasons: maybe you never did a defrag before or it was a long time ago, maybe a lot of data has changed on your disk, maybe you have an antivirus or any other program that makes the defrag often restart...
-
-
Yes it's possible...but take a look to see if there is a progress at least in % from time to time
Don't forget that you have a 5400 RPM so it's even more longer than with a 7200RPM regular desktop PC disk
The best is to let it run while being away from computer, also try to close as many programs as possible (including antivirus) and don't forget to disable sleep -
-
DMANbluesfreak Notebook Consultant
Yeah vista defragmenter sucks... try Auslogics Defragmenter. It goes at least 2-3 times as fast and does a better job.
-
-
Vista's defragmenter has no option to see the progress display or to gauge when the defrag will be complete. As I've said before, it's a great idea i.e. automatic system defrag- but poorly implemented by Microsoft. Sadly, it looks like SP1 won't fix the broken Vista defragger apart from giving an option of selecting the volumes on which it will run. If it worked properly, then it would have been killer - fully automatic and smart defrag without the user needing to do a thing...unlike manual or scheduled defrag.
-
Personally I find the progress bar and colour blocks redundant in Vista defrag. I run it once a week and I always leave it running in the background while I do whatever I need on the notebook except gaming. Check back in a few hours and it's done. Never timed it myself but I don't remember it taken longer than 2 hours on my 100GB HDD about 80% full.
I see many recommendations with Auslogics Defrag. Used it before on XP and I agree it is fast, too fast in fact. Sometimes I wonder if it did its job probably or not. I have my reserve with its proclaimed n% performance gain after defrag to be honest. -
What I found interesting is watching the program as it's proccessing the clusters of each file (of certain size). That is one thing I never saw in any native Windows defragger, as it was never intimately shown what was going on. -
I have about 20 GB full on my 100 GB 7200 RPM hard drive and have no problems with the Vista degrag tool. I run it once per week and it finishes successfully in what I would estimate at less than an hour. I'll have to keep track of time next time I run it and post back, but I am not sure what is the cause of all the problems people are having.
-
ToxicBanana Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer
My first defrag was 1 month after a clean install of Vista. I was using 110Gb or 160 when I defraged - it took 11 hours. So yes, it can be very slow.
I have been told it is faster if you run if from the command line - not sure why, as I assume it uses the same defrag algorithms. -
-
oh really? so you can't defrag if you cant see the progress indicator?
Like I said with Vista defrag I leave it to run in the background while I do whatever I want on the notebook. Unlike with XP when I had to leave the PC idle for a period of time during defrag, now that's when you have to plan beforehand. -
Defragmenter in Vista taking to long or not working
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by PCPAL, Oct 2, 2007.