The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Does 64 bit Windows 7 Suck horse?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by roastedpork, May 17, 2010.

  1. roastedpork

    roastedpork Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    121
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm looking to purchase a new computer which has Windows 7 64 Bitpre-installed on it, is there a significant different between the 32 bit? Are most programs supported to it, and/or games? I don't really want to buy a computer which may be good for using Microsoft Word, but ain't so helpful in doing what I want with it. BE FREE!

    Thanks,
     
  2. newsposter

    newsposter Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    801
    Messages:
    3,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    only if you have a narrow view on things. if you are looking for things to go wrong, as suggested by the title of your post and the tone of the content, you'll never be happy.
     
  3. MidnightSun

    MidnightSun Emodicon

    Reputations:
    6,668
    Messages:
    8,224
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    231
    There's almost no reason not to go with Windows 7 64-bit in a new computer. 32-bit applications usually run in 64-bit Windows with no problems, and most devices have both 64- and 32-bit drivers. If you still run 16-bit legacy programs, though, you may need to run those programs in a virtual machine.
     
  4. Krane

    Krane Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    706
    Messages:
    4,653
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Yes! It's significantly more advanced. In other words, it can do a lot more than 32 bit.
    Not at the moment. But that's changing everyday so you need to be ready. It's like carrying around your umbrella even though it's not raining. If you know the forecast says rain, it's better to be prepared than not, isn't it?
    That's a question only you can answer. If all you ever us are 32-bit application and never intend to go beyond that, then a 32-bit OS will suit you fine. Otherwise, cast away your nostalgic predilection, and move into the 21st century with the rest of us. :)
     
  5. Pirx

    Pirx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,001
    Messages:
    3,005
    Likes Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    151
    No.

    And I am fairly free, thank you, although I'm not sure why that would matter to you.
     
  6. Shakey_Jake33

    Shakey_Jake33 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The scare-mongering surrounding 64-bit might have been valid in 2005, but has little substance anymore. In fact, as far as Windows 7 goes, the 32-bit version is in the minority. I struggle to think of a significant reason to go 32-bit.
     
  7. fzhfzh

    fzhfzh Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    There are still quite some problems with 64bit though, eg. my office's 90s management system can't run on 64bit at all, so all the computers have to have 32 bit installed, and buying new one is not an option because it's enough for daily usage and a new one cost at least 50k.
     
  8. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    The general consumer will not run into these issues. It is only a problem with old, badly programmed software that is critical for some reason. 90's means that it's over 10 years old, and if it used any DOS-style tricks that aren't allowed with newer, better-designed systems.

    This is the kind of post that needlessly drives people away from 64bit systems.
     
  9. PaulJansen

    PaulJansen Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Buying a 64-bit computer and 64-bit Windows is an investment for the future. The software of tomorrow will work better in 64-bit systems because they can address much more memory.

    I recommend people to buy 64-bit computers / 64-bit Windows, unless they don't have expensive (old) software that can not work in 64-bit Windows. Then maybe they should buy a 32-bit computer/Windows instead. Otherwise, there is no reason.
     
  10. Syberia

    Syberia Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I would definitely go with 64-bit, even if you don't have more than 4 GB of RAM. All the 32-bit programs I have ever tried to run on it work just fine, and the main advantage (besides the ability to address more memory) is that if in the future something gets released that's 64-bit only, you will be able to run it just fine.
     
  11. roastedpork

    roastedpork Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    121
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ah thanks for the input guys, it seems my biased view was indeed a misunderstanding . Can't wait for the new laptop to come in and hope everything runs lovely.

    Thanks again.
     
  12. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
    I hardly consider compatibility with an ancient piece of vertical software to be a problem, any more than DVD players have "problems" because I can't stick a vinyl album in the disc tray.
     
  13. nikolai090

    nikolai090 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    91
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    The 64-Bit OS is indeed better than a 32-Bit OS. 64-Bit drivers now have good support unlike when vista first appeared so you would have no problems with 64-Bit these days. 64-bit OS would run most if not all 32-Bit programs at the same speed a 32-bit OS would.

    For example, a 32-bit program called "X" would run at a speed of: 20*
    Now if there was a 64-Bit version of "X", it would probably run at: 40 or so*
    Which is faster plus you would be able to use more than 3GB RAM.

    *Numerical values are just numbers to show how fast it would run as a sample.

    Long story short, 64-Bit OS is the way to go in this Generation.