The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Effective battery life programs

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by sgogeta4, Oct 25, 2008.

  1. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=3435&p=13

    OS X is beating the snot out of Windows Vista lol. I'm using RM Clock but never thought about comparing battery life against Vista w/ pre-RM Clock. Has anyone tested any other programs for Vista that can improve it's battery life? I hope Windows 7 can give us the OS that Vista was supposed to be.
     
  2. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Superior battery life in OS X over Vista shouldn't be "unexpected" when you consider that Vista is designed for a much bigger hardware base; thus power management is much less refined and difficult to deliver across a large variety of devices. OS X has it easy simply because the OS is designed for a much smaller variety of hardware, namely Apple computers. In contrast, Microsoft has to contend with every piece of computer hardware under the sun.
     
  3. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Hmm. That is a good point. I would think that using similar base hardware (ie. a comparable notebook w/ the same specifications of a MBP), there should be a way to optimize battery life. If you don't use all the extraneous hardware, you should be able to improve the battery life beyond only half the time compared to OS X.
     
  4. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    What would be a fair comparison to Apple's business decision to specify the hardware that can be used (then write the OS for that hardware) would be to allow Microsoft to do the same thing; specify the hardware, then write your OS for that narrow spectrum of hardware.

    Ultimately the test results in the link you provided are not because of Apple's technological brilliance; it is simply because of Apple's business decision to confine OS X to proprietary hardware. Why, one might ask? Because Apple doesn't want OS X to compete directly with Windows.