The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    For Multi-Cores Multi-Threads's new Benchmark CoresMark 2010

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by extremeprocessor, Aug 9, 2010.

  1. extremeprocessor

    extremeprocessor Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5

    Attached Files:

  2. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    111 sec, Core i5-430UM:
     

    Attached Files:

  3. stivut

    stivut Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    37,574s i7 980X

    Capture002-20100903-154830.jpg
     
  4. xxERIKxx

    xxERIKxx Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    159
    Messages:
    1,488
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  5. Aeris

    Aeris Otherworldly

    Reputations:
    474
    Messages:
    805
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    31
  6. xeroxide

    xeroxide Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    487
    Messages:
    1,390
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    here's my 2 runs
    920xm @ 25x / 26x multiplier

    coresmark2k10.jpg
     
  7. spradhan01

    spradhan01 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,392
    Messages:
    3,599
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I got 145 sec in QX9300.
    Something is wrong.