The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    From a 14 year old: Should I use Windows XP?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by kevI4, Dec 13, 2007.

  1. kevI4

    kevI4 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    As many of you have probably seen by now I'm stuck on a Thinkpad T21 Pentium III 750mhz, 256mb RAM, S3Graphics Savage 8mb vRam, 11.2gb hard drive, and a CD-ROM drive with Windows 2000. Yes it is pathetic and isn't a laptop for the year 2007. More about it here.

    I'm thinking of running Windows XP instead of Windows 2000. Will this speed up the computer? Will it use more of my precious RAM? (I might upgrade RAM to 384mb or 512mb) Or is it a joke to run Windows XP? I just need it to do some word processing and internet. I'm trying to keep it the bare minimum. Gaming is like a forlorn dream lol.
     
  2. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Win XP SP2 requieres 256MB minimum, 512MB if you want to do other things than MSN messanger, 768 to start being good and 1GB to be comfortable.

    I had an Old P3 733 with 384mb of RAM, it did fine until SP1 was released.

    Staying on 2000 and upgrading to 384 or 512MB of RAM should ease your lag problems though
     
  3. pixelot

    pixelot Notebook Acolyte

    Reputations:
    3,732
    Messages:
    6,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    XP will take up even more RAM and HD space. Not recommended by me.
     
  4. booboo12

    booboo12 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    4,062
    Messages:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    95
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I would have to agree with the others and suggest that you stick with 2000. If you were upgrading from Windows 98 or ME then I would say definetly yes, but since Windows XP is essentially a more consumer friendly Windows 2000, it's not really necessary
     
  5. aan310

    aan310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    738
    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    106
    psh... ok... i have a pemtium III ar 300mhz with 128mb of ram running smothly with a vista style lookthing... and office 2007.... if you actually NEED xp... you'll be fine
     
  6. millermagic

    millermagic Rockin the pinktop

    Reputations:
    330
    Messages:
    1,742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    2000 is a decent operating system.

    and anything is better than ME
     
  7. ChristopherAKAO4

    ChristopherAKAO4 Notebook Nut

    Reputations:
    641
    Messages:
    1,700
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I'm on a similar rig.

    Dell Latitude C600
    PIII 850 MHz
    384MB RAM
    60GB HDD
    ATI M3 8 MB VRAM
    DVD-ROM
    Win2K

    I feel for you. I would stick with Windows 2000 myself unless you just need XP to run a certain program. I think XP will run OK though, but if you don't NEED it don't.
     
  8. txqzr4

    txqzr4 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm running XP on a Gateway Solo 9150, 400mhz PIII, 256MB as I type this. It works just fine for surfing, MS Office, etc . . .
     
  9. kevI4

    kevI4 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Were you being saracastic :rolleyes: or is it possible to actually run XP on something like that? The thing is I lost my Windows 2000 CD and it hasn't been reinstalled from like the year 2000. It kind of messed up some of my system setting lol. BTW, I just saw on wikipedia XP system requirements and mine fits into the category of recommended charts. I just need it to run word 2000 and some internet, that's all

    Well, I guess after seeing this I'm quite happy. How happy are you with XP with those specs txqzr? Do you feel like you just want to smash the computer?
     
  10. Sahin

    Sahin ---------------

    Reputations:
    156
    Messages:
    1,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    YOu are making a big deal for being 14 bragging about being young. Anyway XP should work fine but don't take this bad but Windows 98 will work very fast on that laptop.
     
  11. kevI4

    kevI4 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    whoah whoah... I am not bragging! I just want the world to know they need an answer for a 14 year old, because if I didn't write my age the majority of the people would tell me to get a job and save up money for a new computer instead of upgrading! Did you just say Windows 98? I don't think you've ever used that OS. Do you know how miserable it is to freeze every 30 min and have a BSOD every hour or so? Do you?
     
  12. Sahin

    Sahin ---------------

    Reputations:
    156
    Messages:
    1,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It is not that bad in fact it you like maybe you should run windows 95 or even me. Real retro!
     
  13. txqzr4

    txqzr4 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It works fine for what I do, which is surfing the web (Youtube is stuttery though) word processing and playing a few prehistoric games.
     
  14. MegaBUD

    MegaBUD Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    45
    Messages:
    670
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Kid... its late... go to bed...