The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    How reliable is the Windows Experience Index?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Queequeg, Jan 2, 2008.

  1. Queequeg

    Queequeg Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Is this Experience Index... Aero thing reliable for comparing the gaming performance of a computer?

    It's telling me that my 'Gaming graphics' is 5.8 but after putting my desktop 7800gt to the same tests (such as Crysis) as the new M8800 GTX, it falls a little short of the 8800 but the 8800, I believe, has a 5.8 for gaming gx as well.
     
  2. imrlybord7

    imrlybord7 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    It gives you a ballpark estimate. The 8800 is probably 3 times better than the 7800, so it was kind of off in that case.
     
  3. Queequeg

    Queequeg Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking too... thought the 7800's the desktop version and the 8800's the mobile version, but still I'd say it was way off.
     
  4. Gintoki

    Gintoki Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,886
    Messages:
    6,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    To answer that question, no. Not really that reliable. It's pretty iffy.
     
  5. thnksfrthmmrs

    thnksfrthmmrs Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    294
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You shouldn't judge a PC's performance by the experience index. Some people even edit it so they get a 5.9 on everything lol.
     
  6. Evolution

    Evolution Vox Sola

    Reputations:
    413
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You mean a 9.9 lol :D
     
  7. A Led Rock

    A Led Rock Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    6
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    uhh i got 4.8 for ram with 2gb

    and i'm getting 4.8 for memory with 3gb


    therefore not reliable at all lol
     
  8. alexzeon

    alexzeon Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The ram one is for the SPEED but not the SIZE.
     
  9. frazell

    frazell Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    81
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Not reliable at all... For example...

    My desktop had a E2160 800Mhz FSB with 2GB od DDR2 667 RAM which had a RAM score of 4.8. That 4.8 score was the same as my i1520 (specs in sig). I changed the E2160 to an E6750 with a 1333Mhz FSB and now the RAM score is a 5.9...

    This is evidence to me that Vista is rating the RAM higher due to the higher FSB, but the RAM speed won't change with a faster FSB (as the FSB wasn't limiting the RAM).

    The RAM index should rate the same unless the RAM was replaced with faster RAM or in a system that wasn't able to operate it at its rated speed.
     
  10. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    its still pointless, speed or size.

    2 gigs of ram at 667mhz is what it is. you don't need an experience index to tell you anything else about it.
     
  11. PhoenixFx

    PhoenixFx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    744
    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    To measure 3D performance, use something like 3D Mark or a game benchmark (average FPS)
     
  12. surfasb

    surfasb Titles Shmm-itles

    Reputations:
    2,637
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I find it hard to believe the Windows Experience Index was ever suppose replace a performance benchmarking program. I thought the Index was there mainly to see if your computer would handle the Windows Aero interface. BTW, the interface is garbage. Vista Basic Theme FTW.
     
  13. Relativity17

    Relativity17 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    141
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I think WEI was meant to gauge the "vista user experience" that one could expect from some given hardware configuration, and can also be used as a tentative indication of bottlenecks, in the event that the user would want to upgrade their hardware.

    Not to say however that it shouldn't be taken with a grain of salt.
     
  14. pcgamer08

    pcgamer08 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    20
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I think a bit of it is to make you feel good about your laptop having a high score :) , its not accurate but like 'surfasb' said I think its more about the aero interface and what 'Relativity17' is also saying.