The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    IE9 RC Released

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Jayayess1190, Feb 10, 2011.

  1. anseio

    anseio All ways are my ways.

    Reputations:
    1,940
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Again, it's a relative term when considering internet speeds. I tether through my cell phone and have been getting 150Kbps on average, until I started using a different cable (and setting my phone on my aluminum ODD enclosure). I now get rates up to 700Kbps. beatyoftheweb was not what I consider to be "slow" given my connection speeds. For those who demand more instant loading, I'm sure it is.
     
  2. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Even at 150Kbit/s say a 20KB html file would arrive in just over 1s

    -> In theory I should have about 3MBit/s down (hits 4, best was possibly close to 5) but I was waiting for that page to slowly load...

    Plain HTML is very, very small. My website runs from Home, it used to be 45KB/s up, now it's about 110KB/s up. It works fine, it's plain HTML, a bit of CSS - images are hosted on Flickr.
     
  3. michael_recycled

    michael_recycled Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    329
    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I love this one:
    So, formerly, browsing the web required only 10% CPU load, now with IE9 you finally managed to get 100% :cool:

    jk,
    Michael
     
  4. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I think it's more in the past browsing couldn't take a lot of resources, now it can - but still, all the netbook users will feel happy :) and I would hate loosing battery life to some ridiculous animations that waste my time.
     
  5. Rodster

    Rodster Merica

    Reputations:
    1,805
    Messages:
    5,043
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    251
    I think IE9 looks cleaner but I prefer IE8. :)
     
  6. lineS of flight

    lineS of flight Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    363
    Messages:
    2,330
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    This is about the problem I mentioned before about how Gmail renders in IE9 RC - text being too small and somewhat blurred. Initially, I thought something was wrong with my settings - so I tried everything I could think of and what others on various forums suggested. I then found that others have the same problem too. See here, here and here. I hope Google/ MS are able to solve this because otherwise IE9 seems to be a very good browser.
     
  7. TSE

    TSE Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    235
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    31
    How/where do I install Flash 10.2? If I go to the link, it says Internet Explorer 9 is not supported.
     
  8. TwiztidKidd

    TwiztidKidd Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    372
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I find IE9 RC to use less resources CPU and RAM. I'm very disappointed with the download progress bar which is missing from the taskbar. What happened there? This is supposed to be a better version than the previous one. I'm back to IE8 for this reason mainly.
     
  9. KonstantinDK

    KonstantinDK Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    67
    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Guys, you don't keep up with news. It's not really about the size of the page anymore, its about how many requests browser need to send.
    But, still true, lots of animation and flashy stuff requires lots of requests.
     
  10. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    -> Size matters too.

    I will not wait for a site to load 5s or so because some idiot made it too big. And quite a few sites are unbearable without an adblocker or cached data - because of images or funny menus.

    And yes, I view a site at 100KB as slow -> if you live in Korea or Japan size won't matter if you have 50MBit/s internet, but then the servers possibly can't keep up.
    -> a small page will ALWAYS load faster that an a big one - no matter if one has 10 or 20 requests.
     
  11. JWBlue

    JWBlue Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    85
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Does it load pages faster than Chrome?

    That is all I care about.
     
  12. lineS of flight

    lineS of flight Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    363
    Messages:
    2,330
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Arguably, yes (on my set up that is).
     
  13. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Internet Explorer 9 Tracking Protection Lists not all created equal
    ZDnet

     
  14. comrade_commissar7

    comrade_commissar7 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    87
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Does anyone know when the non-beta IE9 will be released? Any clues? :)
     
  15. lineS of flight

    lineS of flight Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    363
    Messages:
    2,330
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    If by that you mean IE 9 final (RTW), then allegedly it is to be sometime around April. But this is all rumour so take it for what it is worth.
     
← Previous page