The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Increasing resolution increases power consumption ?!

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Laptopaddict, Mar 18, 2010.

  1. Laptopaddict

    Laptopaddict Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    MSI U115 here with native 1024x600 resolution but graphics card offers possibility to increase resolution to 1024x768.

    When I increase resolution, I see that power consumption (using RMClock) jumps by about 1 Watt, is this normal ?
     
  2. newsposter

    newsposter Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    801
    Messages:
    3,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    very normal. increased resolution means that your cpu and gpu have to move more data around. don't worry about it.
     
  3. coolguy

    coolguy Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    805
    Messages:
    4,679
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Native resolution cannot be less than maximum resolution. I think you are using a wrong GPU driver.
     
  4. Joel

    Joel coffeecoffeecoffeecoffee

    Reputations:
    1,059
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It'd make sense, more resolution, means needing more power to do things with the extra space.
     
  5. jackluo923

    jackluo923 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,038
    Messages:
    3,071
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    That is only true for some laptops. My netbook can do 1920x1080 on the 1024x600 native resolution lcd screen.
     
  6. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    As jackluo said, it is possible. My friend could do 1920 x 1080 with XP on his Acer Aspire One, and I can do 1440 x 1080 on an old CRT only capable of 1280 x 1024. It just zooms into the screen instead, so when you use it, you have to scroll around the desktop around the screen to use it and see everything. Not everything is see-able at once.

    Sorry if I confused you more. :p
     
  7. Wolf04

    Wolf04 Sony Fanatic

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Yep, my old Toshiba had this "feature". The native resolution was 1024x768 but the highest supported resolution was 1600x1200. I had to scroll around the desktop area, quite annoying actually so I usually kept it at 1024x768.
     
  8. namaiki

    namaiki "basically rocks" Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    3,905
    Messages:
    6,116
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    216
    1280x1024 on a 1280x720 screen is nearly alright.
     
  9. coolguy

    coolguy Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    805
    Messages:
    4,679
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I thought the GPU driver detects the maximum/ native resolution of an LCD and sets it as the maximum attainable resolution.
     
  10. Amnesiac

    Amnesiac 404

    Reputations:
    1,312
    Messages:
    3,433
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Some do, some don't. It seems that a lot of older drivers or GPU's have this capability, a lot of the newer ones don't.
     
  11. Laptopaddict

    Laptopaddict Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I tested again , it is more like 0.5 Watt
     
  12. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    maybe the graphics card is doing extra work to downscale each frame...