The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    MPEG vs. WMV

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Greg, Jun 11, 2008.

  1. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Can someone tell the difference between the same video stream encoded in MPEGII versus a WMV file half the size?
     
  2. Lithus

    Lithus NBR Janitor

    Reputations:
    5,504
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Not sure what you mean, but the easiest way to tell would be to use your eyes.

    I'm pretty sure WMV is based off MPEG4, which has better compression than MPEG2.
     
  3. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I've been viewing a few video clips...but maybe I don't know what to look for.

    I have a few files stored complements of Vista MCE, in MS-DVR format. I converted all three to MPEGII and then to WMV. The WMV files took half the space for the same length. I'm pretty much looking for a way to convert stored/DVR'ed video into a more compressed format...because MS-DVR takes up a lot of space.
     
  4. MaXimus

    MaXimus Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    432
    Messages:
    1,906
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The looks depend on the compression rate you set. But WMV gives you better compression as MPEG is not compressed.

    So if space matters, convert your clips to WMV but keeping a high mb/s ratio to maintain the quality
     
  5. trwrt

    trwrt Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    MS-DVR is already MPEGII. Rather than re-encoding it I would suggest changing your capture settings to use lower resolution or lower quality from the beginning. Converting media between compressed formats is usually not desirable since it introduces lots of artifacts.

    There are capture cards out there now that output MPEG4 instead of MPEGII, one of those would be the best of all worlds. I think Conexant is the brand I'm thinking of, I saw one at Circuit City a few weeks ago for under $100.
     
  6. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I already have a TV tuner, which plugs into Vista MCE. It takes beautiful recordings, but I want to compress them a little more without loosing too much.

    AFAIK, Vista MCE decides how big the final files are...not the tuner.
     
  7. trwrt

    trwrt Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    That kinda sucks that MCE won't let you change settings. I run SageTV and you can change the settings to whatever the board supports, I capture at 480x480, about 1.6 GB/hr, but then I don't have an HD set either. In your case recompressing probably makes sense if MCE is capturing at DVD quality (which is probably the default), and go with the MPEG4-derived one (WMV) as suggested by Lithus above.
     
  8. PhoenixFx

    PhoenixFx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    744
    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Take some snapshots and compare, cos you may not be able to see any difference while the video is playing. Look for evidence of blocky video or sometimes a shadow/ residue left behind by a fast moving object.

    I think MPEG4/H.264 or DivX/XViD is better than WMV.

    Here are some samples

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    (Source)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015