The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    MS vs OS X for SSD

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by killeraardvark, Nov 19, 2008.

  1. killeraardvark

    killeraardvark Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So it looks to me that MS is taking SSD serious and is doing a lot to make sure it works well on 7.

    I have not seen OS X run on SSD and would like to know if it even runs good? Is Apple going to also make improvements for SSD in there Snow Leopard or will they let MS do the work and copy?

    Please do not turn this into a flame war. Both OS's are awesome. This is a pretty simple issue and would like to have mature discuss this.
     
  2. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477 Sam I Am

    Reputations:
    213
    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I know that I have heard about Microsoft making improvements for SSDs to Windows 7 like you said, but I haven't heard anything about Apple and SSDs either. I am also wondering if they have something in the works as far as SSDs go.

    -J.B.
     
  3. SpeedyMods

    SpeedyMods Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    167
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    As of right now, Apple is ahead, as the HFS+ is superior to NTFS for SSDs.

    Mac users have purchased the cheap SSDs (OCZ Core, etc) and have not experienced the stuttering that Windows users have.

    Greg
     
  4. atbnet

    atbnet Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    5,868
    Messages:
    5,889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Neither are very well optimized for SSDs according to the SSD manufacturers.
     
  5. killeraardvark

    killeraardvark Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Unfortunately both OS's write to much garbage to the HD all the time and should only write to the HD if a file is modified. They should have secondary ram on the board to act as a HD for caching. Just a thought, dont even know how that would even work.
     
  6. killeraardvark

    killeraardvark Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Does anyone have any better idea that would make SSD scream on systems?
     
  7. jisaac

    jisaac Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    306
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  8. killeraardvark

    killeraardvark Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Wow that is pretty cool. So are they going to put that in 7 and if they do how much better is it going to be?
     
  9. mdrift

    mdrift Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Another idea going around is to implement the file system directly into the SSD. With this solution, optimizations can be done by the SSD manufacturer.

    the url below is marke-t-w-a-t-ch without the -

    marke****ch.com/news/story/SanDisk-Introduces-ExtremeFFS-New-Flash/story.aspx?guid={6096177E-1745-4BFC-9046-AE82E62ABC1F}
     
  10. tipoo

    tipoo Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    33
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  11. jackluo923

    jackluo923 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,038
    Messages:
    3,071
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Um.. there are many programs which have the capability to buffer read/write to ssd.

    E.g. http://zflashpoint.blogspot.com/

    Basically, what these programs do is to use ram as a secondary buffer which gives time for data to collect in the buffer then writes the data to SSD in big chunks thus increasing the average throughtput of the SSD. Also, you won't experience any "shutters" at all when using these programs.

    I don't know any of these tools of OSX though, so if you're using those SSD with the problematic JMicron SSD controller, then I guess you're out of luck.
     
  12. Padmé

    Padmé NBR Super Pink Princess

    Reputations:
    4,674
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Please do not bring up threads 6 months or older. Feel free to start a new thread on this subject.

    Thread closed.