The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    New Hard drive fresh install Vista x64 question

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Meetloaf13, Feb 5, 2008.

  1. Meetloaf13

    Meetloaf13 fear the MONKEY!!!

    Reputations:
    547
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Hey guys,

    Really quick, I don't want this to be a lengthy thread, b/c I know the data is probably else where in the forum, just not all in the same thread.

    I may purchase a new hard drive and I'm not sure how to restore the little hidden partition and the Media direct (I can follow Flamenco's thread if I need to).

    My question is, do I need to create these two partitions? I don't plan on using media direct ever. Does Vista create the backup partition automatically?

    Thanks for the help.
     
  2. The_Punisher

    The_Punisher Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, if you never use the media direct there is no sense in reinstalling it. Partitioning can be done in the Windows installer if you want it. And no, Vista doesn't create a recovery partition, thats up to you.
    You can create a recovery partition if you want to. There is software out there for it.
     
  3. Meetloaf13

    Meetloaf13 fear the MONKEY!!!

    Reputations:
    547
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Is a recovery partition worth it if I have an external I will backup to?
     
  4. ScifiMike12

    ScifiMike12 Drinking the good stuff

    Reputations:
    801
    Messages:
    2,529
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    No, it's not worth it. A recovery partiton helps when you don't have a physical OS disc. Also, drivers and software will not be up-to-date, so that's another downside to it.
     
  5. Meetloaf13

    Meetloaf13 fear the MONKEY!!!

    Reputations:
    547
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Excellent, that leaves some available partitions for me then

    = Happy me!

    Thanks guys!
     
  6. orev

    orev Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    809
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Or you can just make your main disk partition bigger.
     
  7. Fade To Black

    Fade To Black The Bad Ass

    Reputations:
    722
    Messages:
    3,841
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Yeah, stick to less partitions as possible. Even though some might disagree, it saves disk space.
     
  8. Meetloaf13

    Meetloaf13 fear the MONKEY!!!

    Reputations:
    547
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Excellent. Looks like I will leave it to two partitions then.

    I am currently dual-booting, but I am interested in Running XP through Virtual PC (I only need it to use a few outdated programs & printer drivers at school). Would that require a separate partition? If not, would it be beneficial to have the files on a separate partition?
     
  9. Fade To Black

    Fade To Black The Bad Ass

    Reputations:
    722
    Messages:
    3,841
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    You don't need an extra partition to use XP on a virtual machine. I only have two partitions, one for the Vista and one for the rest of the stuff and I'm happy with how things are right now. If I want to use VMware I just store the virtual machines on D.
     
  10. orev

    orev Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    809
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I'm a heavy user of VMware (which you can get the server version for free), and that can use a separate partition or it can create virtual disk files on your current partition. There is no need for a separate partition and the disk file method is mush more flexible.

    I don't know about Virtual PC, but I would guess that it is similar. I would use disk files if it can, and skip the additional partition.
     
  11. Meetloaf13

    Meetloaf13 fear the MONKEY!!!

    Reputations:
    547
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I'm down with using VMware...either way, looks like I'll be needing to hop on some forums to figure out how the heck to get all that up and running :D
     
  12. Meetloaf13

    Meetloaf13 fear the MONKEY!!!

    Reputations:
    547
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Sorry for the double-post:
    @Fade: How do you have your two partitions divvied up?
     
  13. Fade To Black

    Fade To Black The Bad Ass

    Reputations:
    722
    Messages:
    3,841
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Well, 16GB for Windows Server 2008, the rest for the other stuff. I only install the programs on C, no games.