This is the lowest I could get my new dv5t. Is 45 processes okay? Or should I be looking to lower this number by more? I am using Windows Vista and did not do a fresh install. Just removed all the bloatware I could.
Thanks!
-
If you are in Vista I would say that is pretty normal, but you probably could get it down by a few more.
-
There's likely some bloatware parts lingering. You may want to look over the Task Manager and maybe msconfig for anything you don't think should be there.
-
cheers ... -
Click me. After you're done changing your services using this great link, post a screenshot of your Task Manager, and we'll help you weed out useless 3rd party services.
-
INEEDMONEY Homicidal Teddy Bear
As qhn said, there's nothing wrong with 45 processes unless you suffering performance issues.
I have 44 right now myself without any problems -
Haha. I have 55 or so processes at start up, but I do run a full anti-malware suite (Avira + SUPERAntiSpyware + Comodo), a dock, undervolting, overclocking, and about 10 other things.
-
-
The number of processes running is a horribly silly metric for... well, anything.
Do the running processes provide the functionality you need? Are any of them running out of control, as in, not sleeping 99.999% of the time? Then you're good.
Having 100 processes running with very low memory and idle CPU usage is better than 50 processes with high memory and idle CPU usage. -
45 is nothing! I am usually in the 90s to 100 range.
-
ScuderiaConchiglia NBR Vaio Team Curmudgeon
Gary -
New Laptop: 45 Processes
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by billiton, Aug 20, 2008.