The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Predictions: Will Windows 7 beat Windows 95?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Peon, Sep 22, 2009.

  1. Peon

    Peon Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    406
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    81
    In terms of marketing and perceptions, that is ;)

    Windows 95 had a phenomenally successful launch, and has been used as a measuring stick for success by Microsoft for every Windows launch since then (e.g. "Windows Vista will be bigger than Windows 95"). Of course, none of the Windows releases since have even come close to Windows 95.

    So do you guys think that Windows 7 will finally live up to the claim? Will people be lining up for hours at Best Buy on October 22nd just to be the first in line to get their hands on Windows 7? Will random celebrities start claiming on talk shows that Windows 7 has changed their life? Yes, this sounds like the iPhone or PS3 launch, but it actually happened for Windows 95.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015
  2. booboo12

    booboo12 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    4,062
    Messages:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    116
    No, i doubt it. Windows 95 was revolutionary, it was a time where many were trying to advance their lives with tech that was growing at a rapid pace. Now, many people have computers, the need to rush out and get the latest version of Windows has diminished greatly. I doubt that any significant lines will be forming for W7 as revolutionary certainly isn't one of it's qualities, IMO.
     
  3. DarkSilver

    DarkSilver MSI Afterburner

    Reputations:
    378
    Messages:
    2,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I say NO. Because Windows 95 is the prime and the origin of all Windows. XD
    No Windows 95 = No Windows 7.
    No parents don't have son/daughter.

    There is a phrase like the newer generation will surpass the older 1. LOL.

    This topic is arguable. XD
     
  4. Han Bao Quan

    Han Bao Quan The Assassin

    Reputations:
    4,071
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    No, unless MS puts all of their geniuses together and comes up with something that completely change the concept of an Operating system.
     
  5. booboo12

    booboo12 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    4,062
    Messages:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Exactly! :D
     
  6. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Trophy Points:
    931
    No. Windows 95 was absolutely revolutionary. Try using Windows 3.1 vs. Windows 95. It was a huge leap and vast improvement over it's precessor. Windows 7 is a great improvement over Vista, but not revolutionary. I think if Windows 7 as it is today followed XP in 2005 it would have been amazing.
     
  7. Vinyard

    Vinyard Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    63
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    It wont beat Windows 95, it's a fact. When Windows 95 was released it was very successful and many people stopped using Netscape which was the dominating browser at that time. Windows 95 was responsible for Netscapes bankruptcy.
     
  8. DarkSilver

    DarkSilver MSI Afterburner

    Reputations:
    378
    Messages:
    2,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The poll seems that Windows 7 beats Windows 95.
    I can smell this situation is due to human brain directly reaction. Which is didn't think twice before voting.
    Can't blame.
     
  9. GoodBytes

    GoodBytes NvGPUPro

    Reputations:
    742
    Messages:
    3,108
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    No and yes.
    I predict that Windows 7 will have have a very successful launch, perhaps just as good as Windows 95.
    Beat in terms of innovation at a UI level? of course not. It does have a new things, but nothing as big as what Windows 95.
    Beat in terms of innovation at a Core level? That was Vista, presenting a new core for new technologies. From my perspective Vista core is better designed than Win95 and NT3 kernel. Some few things about Vista core that beats the previous Windows kernels, are: security, stability, driver architecture component (not tied to the kernel, restarting computer is optional upon installing new/updated drivers. If driver crash, it can be restarted without BSOD), and its superb memory management. Sadly that was Vista... not Win7.

    Beat in quality of product? I believe it's a close race. Windows 7 is very polished. Not perfect. I do expect some issues after release. But these are inevitable, and Win95 wasn't perfect, either.
     
  10. Uroboros

    Uroboros Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    NO and thats why I still use win 95 today... When my new laptop comes Ill be downgrading imediatly, installing Aol, download some punters, and hit the chat rooms with a vengance.
     
  11. SpacemanSpiff

    SpacemanSpiff Everything in Moderation

    Reputations:
    3,428
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Very true. If you've never used Windows 3.1, you can't truly appreciate the improvement.
     
  12. Han Bao Quan

    Han Bao Quan The Assassin

    Reputations:
    4,071
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Man, those days with typing Ms-Dos commands and running Norton commander. How can I forget :D
    Windows 95 was like Alice in the wonderland for me.
     
  13. Angelic

    Angelic Kickin' back :3

    Reputations:
    4,496
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    [​IMG]
    Wasn't 3.1 great?
    Beat the crap out of Windows 95! :p

    Um all seriousness, no W7 won't beat 95, it's just not as innovative.
     
  14. GoodBytes

    GoodBytes NvGPUPro

    Reputations:
    742
    Messages:
    3,108
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Yea, Minesweeper under Win3.1 was way better than the one under Win95.
     
  15. kanehi

    kanehi Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    146
    Messages:
    1,943
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Does it matter? The point being?
     
  16. TehSuigi

    TehSuigi Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    931
    Messages:
    3,882
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Beat Win95 in performance? Oh hell yes.
    In terms of marketing success, who knows? 41% of corporate IT departments have already said they'd be migrating to 7 from XP/Vista, so that in itself is a huge accomplishment.
    I believe that 7 will be the new gold standard for OSs from Microsoft for a few years, like XP was.
     
  17. Han Bao Quan

    Han Bao Quan The Assassin

    Reputations:
    4,071
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    We're talking about windows 95 and windows 7 compared to its predecessors.
    Compare 7 to vista - well, there isn't much to say really!
    Compare 95 to anything before that - that's like penguin and eagle!
     
  18. surfasb

    surfasb Titles Shmm-itles

    Reputations:
    2,637
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    OMG, old school FILE MANAGER!!!!!!

    I remember the old 3.1 File Manager displayed free disk space in KB!!!!!

    It wasn't til 3.11 that they changed it to MB!!

    I miss the old double paned File Manager :(
     
  19. booboo12

    booboo12 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    4,062
    Messages:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    116
    I miss 3.1. I liked the "computer mouse tutorial", cheesy as it was. :D
     
  20. illmatic8

    illmatic8 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    153
    Messages:
    297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    LMAO, good times
     
  21. CompUG

    CompUG Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    40
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i dont remember anything about 3.1 a lil about 95, i'm was too young to use a computer..
     
  22. darthvader1432

    darthvader1432 - Audiophile -

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    exactly and we all know bob marley is much better than damian marley
     
  23. swiego

    swiego Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    12
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Not even close. Windows 95 was like the PS2, the iPhone... people lined up to get their copies. As someone else mentioned, it was a paradigm leap right at a time when computers were coming to be perceived as a tool for personal and career enrichment. Remember, Windows 95 was the software that would get Joe Sixpack on the internet.

    Windows 7, as mass-market perceptions go, is Vista with different graphics. As much as I like and am impressed by W7, I'm under no illusions that it will enable something that I previously was not able to do under even Windows XP.