The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    ReadyBoost (Vista); save battery life?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Steven87, Feb 6, 2007.

  1. Steven87

    Steven87 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Does using Readyboost in Vista to cache files to a flash memory card (SD, Compact Flash, USB Key etc.) save battery life (if so how much)? As the hard drive is being used less and flash memory uses less power.
    Thanks.
     
  2. qhn

    qhn Notebook User

    Reputations:
    1,654
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    NO

    cheers ...
     
  3. Steven87

    Steven87 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    55
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ok, I just though it might as loading from a cached file on a memory card should use less power than accessing a hard drive. I have heard of hybrid hard drives that supposedly extend battery life by using flash memory, so wouldn't ReadyBoost work in a similar way?
     
  4. jpagel

    jpagel Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    20
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I dont think so, since not only is it using your HD it is using the SD/USB flash memory so that would technically be using a little more power.
     
  5. qhn

    qhn Notebook User

    Reputations:
    1,654
    Messages:
    5,955
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    it would give it more speed and reaction time, i just can't see how it would be related to using less power - good deduction, though

    cheers ...