The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    So how much truth is in this article?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Seeker913, Mar 8, 2007.

  1. Seeker913

    Seeker913 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  2. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    They decide which programs you can and can't use on your computer

    Not really...

    They decide which features of your computer or software you can use at any given moment

    Um...no, though it might allow them to detect pirate software and stop it at best. Stopping software you purchased is quite probably illegal.

    They force you to install new programs even when you don't want to (and, of course, pay for the privilege)

    I cannot think of a single valid example here...

    They restrict your access to certain programs and even to your own data files

    No...it allows YOU to restrict access to programs and files so other people that aren't supposed to be snooping around don't get to your stuff. It also is decent parental control...but that's it.

    If your copy of Vista came with the purchase of a new computer, that copy of Vista may only be legally used on that machine, forever.

    It has always been that way...even since before XP.

    If you bought Vista in a retail store and installed it on a machine you already owned, you have to completely delete it on that machine before you can install it on another machine.

    That IS the definition of a one use license...and just about every software program out there is like that.

    You give Microsoft the right, through programs like Windows Defender, to delete programs from your system that it decides are spyware.

    Which is why I don't use MS security software...but I've never seen anything like that in Vista yet.

    You consent to being spied upon by Microsoft, through the “Windows Genuine Advantage” system. This system tries to identify instances of copying that Microsoft thinks are illegitimate. Unfortunately, a recent study indicated that this system has already screwed up in over 500,000 cases.

    Again, it's an anti-piracy thing. I hate false positives, but I'm sure that MS got 500,000 angry calls when that happened. 500k for the millions upon millions of computers out there really isn't bad...

    Did that study indicate how many people were able to call MS and fix the issue? No...

    All in all, it's just another inaccurate rant about Vista.
     
  3. Airman

    Airman Band of Gypsys NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    703
    Messages:
    1,675
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I concur, however they do point out one thing thats wrong with Vista- it's DRM infected!
     
  4. l33t_c0w

    l33t_c0w Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    174
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    That article isn't really about Vista vs XP. It's more objections against DRM and software licenses in general. They just singled out Vista because Vista is newsier.
     
  5. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Meh, everyone bashed MS just because they can... ;)