I hate Norton with a passion, and I understand that it's made by Symantec.
That said, how do you guys feel about Symantec's non-Nortion antivirus program - just plain Symantec antivirus. Does it tax system resources heavily? Does it create a significant decrease in speed?
The reason I ask is because my school offers it for free.
Thanks,
Peter
-
-
I"m using it now. It's way better than Nortons. I find it's RAM usage is higher than NOD32, and McAfee Corp 8. It's pretty fast and doesn't bombard you with stupid message pop ups like Nortons. It just works.
I got mine from my school too so I can't complain about the price. -
I want to get Norton out from my computer, and I'm considering McAfee, can someone tell me if is a good idea?
-
IMHO, McAfee hasn't kept up with the competition lately. See pcmag.com review of security suties. If i were buying a security suite for Vista, i would first look at Norton 07, Kaspersky, ZoneAlarm 2007.
-
usapatriot Notebook Nobel Laureate
I would look at NOD32 and Kapersky before considering Norton or McAfee.
-
McAfee sucks...Period. The last version was okay but after I upgraded to the latest version, it turned my computer into a dog! Seriously, it would take me 4 minutes to just log off of XP. Needless to say, I went back the the last version!
-
Go with AVG. Their free version (which comes with daily updates from their mainframes) is better than most "paid" virus programs.
Symantec?
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by NinjaNoodles, Aug 2, 2007.