The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    TAK 1.1.0 released (something like FLAC but more efficient)

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by mk.2, Jan 5, 2009.

  1. mk.2

    mk.2 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    23
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Well, I don't see any post about this new lossless audio codec, so I'm using an opportunity that TAK 1.1.0 was released yesterday to spread the words.

    You can read pretty much most info about this codec on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAK_(audio_codec).

    To illustrate TAK's efficiency, I'll use excerpt from Synthetic Soul's Comparison.

    Code:
    Original WAVE File:                   2030.59 megabytes
    Converted to FLAC -8 -Ax2 (best):     1328.08 megabytes     Encoding time: 16:39 minutes
    Converted to TAK -p1:                 1316.56 megabytes     Encoding time: 01:51 minutes
    Converted to TAK -p4m (best):         1290.33 megabytes     Encoding time: 14:01 minutes
    TAK is a relatively new codec, so there are not many softwares support it natively.
    Mp3tag natively supports TAK format.
    Winamp, Foobar2000, Quintessential Player can play TAK files through plugin.

    You can download TAK 1.1.0 (+winamp plugin) here: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=68456
     
  2. Jlbrightbill

    Jlbrightbill Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    488
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    FLAC is widely accepted as the most versatile lossless audio codec -- it's like trying to dethrone MP3, even though OGG is technically better, MP3 wins.
     
  3. mk.2

    mk.2 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    23
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I guess you misunderstand my point... I'm not trying to make one format more popular than another. Every codec have different uses which appeal to different types of users. I was just recommending an alternative to FLAC.

    I see lossless audio encoding like archiving formats such as ZIP, RAR, 7z. While ZIP is the most popular, it's more suitable to use 7z to archive files as it's more space saving. I can convert to ZIP if I want to share my files with other people (to make sure that they can read those files).

    TAK is just like 7z, it's more space saving, also works faster than FLAC. It's a really better alternative for archiving purpose.