The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    The Number of Processes in Windows Vista

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Nocturnal310, Jul 19, 2008.

  1. Nocturnal310

    Nocturnal310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    792
    Messages:
    2,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What is a good healthy number of processes running in Windows Vista which will let u enjoy a decent performance while gaming?


    These days mine is 60.

    I tried reducing to 50..but seems impossible as smthg stops working suddenly.
     
  2. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Depends how much resources the processes actually take.
     
  3. ravenmorpheus

    ravenmorpheus Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've got 40ish running in Vista and I still don't get very good gaming performance, hence the reason I use XP. I think like flipfire said it depends on how much resources the processess use up.
     
  4. Theros123

    Theros123 Web Designer & Developer

    Reputations:
    116
    Messages:
    1,589
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I have around 60-70....that's after I tweaked the services as well. But for me, it usually runs quite smooth and fast.
     
  5. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
    on both of my Vista x64 rigs, with nothing running I have about 35 processes. Vista keeps doing housekeeping and firing up a temporary process here and there but it's always between 35-38.

    How the heck do you get 70 processes @.@
     
  6. Garandhero

    Garandhero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    262
    Messages:
    1,522
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    46 procceses with nothing running and me going in and "end tasking" some pesky media center stuff that always runs for some reason despite me not using media center.

    With AIM about 50 or 51, peak 60 procceses.
     
  7. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
    The Media Center stuff can be killed/prevented from running. That stupid Media Center thing was the main reason I went with Vista x64 Business on my gaming rig. No Media Center!
     
  8. swarmer

    swarmer beep beep

    Reputations:
    2,071
    Messages:
    5,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Yeah... counting the number of processes is pretty useless. There's a Description field in the Processes tab of Task Manager that tells you what most of the processes do. Read it and figure out what you need or don't need. I also add a Command Line field (from View > Select columns...) which can help figure out what things are. You could also post a Task Manager screenshot here and get some suggestions.
     
  9. Akuma

    Akuma Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    198
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    51 here.
    Can close ~ 7 of them as I'm using these at the moment.

    Though I had about 25 processes running with XP Pro..
     
  10. DurablePants

    DurablePants Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have 28 processes at startup on vista 32bit
     
  11. swarmer

    swarmer beep beep

    Reputations:
    2,071
    Messages:
    5,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Code:
    Windows PowerShell
    Copyright (C) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
    
    PS C:\Users\nick> (get-process).count
    48
    
    :cool:
     
  12. Bog

    Bog Losing it...

    Reputations:
    4,018
    Messages:
    6,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    206
    Yeah, like swarmer said, there is little or no correlation between number of running processes and gaming performance.
     
  13. paul_r_d

    paul_r_d Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    36
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ok I just checked mine- I have exactly 99 processes :( I have no idea how to get rid of them and which ones I should keep. No wonder this is slow as.
     
  14. Hiker

    Hiker Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    448
    Messages:
    1,715
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56

    Yikes that's the most I've ever heard of. I don't run Vista but I'm sure someone can recommend a tweaking guide.

    I'd add another gig of RAM.
     
  15. surfasb

    surfasb Titles Shmm-itles

    Reputations:
    2,637
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I have about 90 running at any one time.
     
  16. Prydeless

    Prydeless Stupid is

    Reputations:
    592
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I have 151 processes running myself. 50 are "avast! Web Scanner" processes and 18 are "Host Process for Windows Services" processes.
     
  17. surfasb

    surfasb Titles Shmm-itles

    Reputations:
    2,637
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    +1 for having a useful machine.

    Lean setups are just glorified web browsers.
     
  18. Leon

    Leon Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    746
    Messages:
    1,552
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Have around 50 processes with 35% RAM.
     
  19. Nocturnal310

    Nocturnal310 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    792
    Messages:
    2,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    U must be kidding!

    thats too much.. how much is your idle CPU usage?
     
  20. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Yeah I have to say thats not too uncommon for a power user. 151 doesnt seem too bad IMHO being as though he/she is probably using their machine. Personally I havent measured running processes as I know it will be high, and the T8100 + 3GB 4-4-4-12 RAM have been able to handle just about anything I have thrown at it with great speed.

    Well not always, I lean down my PCs to the best of my ability to turn off/clean up all the things I wont need to maximize what I can do with my rig. But I do agree that trying to maintain a lean OS will limit what you can and will do. But then again the majority or users are just web surfing and using Office.
     
  21. Theros123

    Theros123 Web Designer & Developer

    Reputations:
    116
    Messages:
    1,589
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    heh, IMO if you don't take a performance hit then why bother trying to clean up all the processes.
     
  22. Prydeless

    Prydeless Stupid is

    Reputations:
    592
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    At the time it didn't go over 5% and usually hung around 1% if not 0. After I restarted the processes went down to 102 and pretty much the same CPU usage.
     
  23. flipfire

    flipfire Moderately Boss

    Reputations:
    6,156
    Messages:
    11,214
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I dont think anyone got what i said earlier. The number of process doesnt directly mean the amount of resource being used.

    Let me elaborate,

    You could have 10 processes using 1000000000% of system resources

    or you can have 10000 processes using 1% of system resource.

    Which is better?
     
  24. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Mime with Tourette's

    Reputations:
    1,163
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I have as many as it takes to run what I want to run. I do tune a bit to get what Windows wants to run in line with what I want to run.

    FWIW, I just looked via TaskMgr. On an idle system there are 45 processes showing (with the Show Processes From All Users box checked).
     
  25. chipmoney

    chipmoney Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    140
    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have 88 running right now...

    I also have plenty of memory and CPU left over too ;)
     
  26. Thaenatos

    Thaenatos Zero Cool

    Reputations:
    1,581
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    231
    As I sit here Im at 81 processes, 52% of 3GB RAM usage, and because I have streaming data as well as a few other open ports 3-10% cpu usage on one core. My system is only light multitasking ATM and is as snappy now as it is after a fresh restart opening the first app, and my rig has been running 24/7 for weeks. What I have running at the moment:

    World of warcraft (damn addiction is sickening)
    3 RDP(Remote desktops)
    AIM Pro
    XM streaming music
    ~7-10 file explorers with minimal file transfers
    Palm desktop (trying to parse palm desktop data /w outlook with a new method)
    MS Active sync
    Jcreator Java compliler (dunno why I left this open with my side project)
    Firefox with 5 tabs
    Ventrillo 3.0 connected
    Windows mobile center
    Windows task manager

    All in all a light session on the Dell.