The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    To all NIS 2007 vista users

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by JCMS, Oct 29, 2007.

  1. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    You can have a *free* upgrade to NIS 2008 (the only big difference being the interface but still). If you go on symantec.com/vistaupdate (where you downloaded the 2007 client for vista), you will notice that the link links to the 2008 client. I downloaded it to see and my 2007 key worked, with my 165 days remaining
     
  2. ScuderiaConchiglia

    ScuderiaConchiglia NBR Vaio Team Curmudgeon

    Reputations:
    2,674
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    [shudders]

    But WHY on earth would anyone WANT to? NIS is such a resource pig.

    Gary
     
  3. Harper2.0

    Harper2.0 Back from the dead?

    Reputations:
    2,078
    Messages:
    3,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Nod32 Ftw!!
     
  4. LIVEFRMNYC

    LIVEFRMNYC Blah Blah Blah!!!

    Reputations:
    3,741
    Messages:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The words Norton and Symantec should be auto blocked like the cuss words.
     
  5. zeinoonm

    zeinoonm Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    15
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Actually NIS from 2007 and on is not the resource hog we used to know before. I had NIS 2007 and upgraded to 2008 and i am happy with it
     
  6. KnightUnit

    KnightUnit Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    42
    Messages:
    500
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I had NIS 2007 for a while and found it not to bad, tried NOD, AVG and found Avast home edition to my favourite with the fact you can tweak it heavily on what you want it to scan on day to day running. My system also feels the quickest running Avast
     
  7. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I've been using NIS since 2006 was launched. I've never noticed a performance drop. It consumes about 100-120MB, wich is pretty negligeable on 1 GB XP /2GB vista
     
  8. ScuderiaConchiglia

    ScuderiaConchiglia NBR Vaio Team Curmudgeon

    Reputations:
    2,674
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Don't know about NIS 2008, but if the OP is right, the "under the hood" aspects have changed little. NIS2006 and NIS2007 are pigs. They consume WAY too much resources. See this article for proof: What REALLY slows Windows down.

    The added I/O overhead is responsible for REALLY slowing down disk I/O. The CPU usage does a number on other applications. The link above provides side-by-side comparisons of the performance hit caused by a number of anti virus and anti spy-ware apps and suites.

    I used to swear by Norton Anti-virus. Now I swear at it. The real damning fact is that Norton itself had to release a "complete uninstall" application because the control panel uninstall didn't do the job.

    I am a Microsoft certified developer. In order to attain that, I had to submit my application to Verisign for testing. One of the major tests was did my uninstall routine truly uninstall the app and all the registry entries. Before I could legally say the app was certified for Windows or display the Windows logo, it had to pass the certification. I am not sure why Symantec has been given a pass on that requirement. But somehow they have.

    Gary
     
  9. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55

    I did this as well once I upgraded to Vista. I must say, it's like it isn't even there. NIS 2008 is a solid utility. Updates never bother me, and it doesn't hassle me otherwise like everyone says Norton does.
     
  10. JCMS

    JCMS Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    455
    Messages:
    4,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Yup, I didn't notice any boot time increase. NIS is actually the first programm to boot for me and it's already on when I see the taskbar.


    Also, I conclude from what I saw that NIS 2008 on Vista x64 consumes 80MB
     
  11. 31337

    31337 Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Kaspersky AV =)
     
  12. coolguy

    coolguy Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    805
    Messages:
    4,679
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Actually NAV 2007/2008 is way better than NIS in resourse utilization.
     
  13. AlexMagik

    AlexMagik Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    NAV is only the antivirus, NIS is also firewall and other stuff... so you can't compare the 2, of course nis will take more memory