I was told that having vista on your laptop you will see about a 25% drop in battery life compared to Xp was wondering how true this is as im considering the change and my battery time is not long so i dont want it any less?
-
Not true, unless your power management software interferes with your Intel SpeedStep in Vista (which is, admittedly, a possibility).
-
Some laptops have a 25% drop. This is mostly due to the ACPI that is handeled differently from XP. Mostly when upgrading older laptops that are designed for XP you can run into this problem. It is the manufactuers fault mostly since it mostly means that they made bad ACPI tables. It is also something Linux fans often complain about. It can only be fixed with a bios update or sometimes special Vista drivers.
Lenovo has shown with the T60 that Vista can use the same amount of battery as XP. I also heared that the HP business class laptops work well. I found that upgrading to Vista and using readyboost gives me better battery performance since the hard disk is used less. -
25% less battery life might not be the case on all systems as has been explained above, but Vista does consume extra power but from my experience it is about 5%-10% mostly due to the fact that the fan runs longer and more frequently compared to XP.
-
What Wave said is probably correct. And what he says about the HP business class notebooks, I can personally vouch for. Atleast my particular model (NC8430). I've experienced between an ever so slight to no change at all in battery time since I installed Vista.
-
Well I've compared to other SZ XP users and I seem to be getting roughly the same amount of battery life with Vista.
-
even though admitedly there is a loss in battery time it isnt that great difference between the two
it also depends on your hardware and the tasks that you were performing whle on battery power
the vista interface is graphic hungry and does need decent graphic power to run which in turn requires more power
it also dpends from person to person as the tasks performed and the background applicatios running etc are different or in short no two systems are completely identical
though there may be loss in battery time it wont be any thing as big as 25% maybe 5-15% at the most as mentioned above
cheers, -
From what I've read that when using the Aero interface the battery life drops but when not using the interface the battery life equals to XP or better.
-
Anyway, it depends a lot on the hardware. The Aero interface, for example, relies heavily on having a GPU that can do 3d graphics without using too much power. -
I'm seeing a 5-10% reduction in battery time.
-
-
I'm really interested to see what my GPU temp. is in Vista. -
http://www.nvidia.com/object/sysutility.html -
I have no noticeable battery life drop. In fact, it almost seems as if I've gained 15 minutes.
-
-
Battery life on my 9-cell Inspiron E1505 seems to have risen a 15-20 minutes in Vista vs. XP. Tasks I do when on battery usually consist of Word, Internet (Wireless On), and/or Excel.
-
CNET has a good article on decreased battery life with Vista ULTIMATE. HP is aware of this problem and is working on a solution. Even beta testers were reporting such a problem but still Microsoft didn't modify the program. This is only happening on ULTIMATE using Aero and not on other flavors of Vista. I did try the Ultimate version with Aero and did notice that the fan is constantly on.
-
With my setup seeminly the same between xp and vista (same power settings, etc same brightness) I went from ~3-3.5 hrs in xp to ~ 2 hrs in vista.
I'm kinda pissed.
Asus W3J. If anyone has any suggestions, please pm me or post here
Vista Battery Hungry?
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Necss, May 1, 2007.