Hello.
When I render a HD 1920x180 H.264 video it takes hours for a 10min clip on my Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 @ 2.66GHz CPU laptop.
I'm thinking of getting a new powerful laptop. Can you please give me some advise on what components in the computer make a big difference in render speeds?
-
-
I thought cs6 was OpenCL based? so any decent GPU should do fine. I think there are also some drive dependencies also, but those might be secondary to the GPU.
-
Cores. Although there's been some progress in GPU powered encoding too (former attempts had reasonable speed but lacked quality). If you really want to render, an i7 and Quick Sync are your best bet.
-
lol, this person posted in two locations with same question...
http://forum.notebookreview.com/sag...nents-improve-render-speeds-premiere-pro.html -
What about GPU's? Do they make any difference in render speeds/time?
For example I hear Nvidia's CUDA cores work well with Premiere pro but I'm not sure if they meant render speeds. Also I'm looking at getting the 7970M so I hope that can contribute to faster renders. I would prefer 680M but I hear it is going to be so much more expensive than 7970m. So I don't think it'll be worth it.
Bottom line question. A laptop with i7 3610QM + 7970m vs i7 3610QM + 680m. Who is going to render a 10min High Definition H.264 video quicker and by how much? -
meh. pretty much any encoder written to use Cuda is also written for Quick Sync. and QS is a lot faster. CUDA vs. ATI Stream vs. Quick Sync
What determines render speed in premiere pro cs6?
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by ObserverJLin, Jun 2, 2012.