The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Win 7 to Silverlight or not

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by Feral1, Dec 12, 2010.

  1. Feral1

    Feral1 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I deleted Silverlight as I could see no benifit. Is there any reason to have Silverlight?
     
  2. usapatriot

    usapatriot Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    3,266
    Messages:
    7,360
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    206
    If you use a website that uses Silverlight (not many). I have it installed, I never notice it cause any problems, so I just let it be.
     
  3. olyteddy

    olyteddy Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    468
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  4. fonduekid

    fonduekid JSUTAONHTERBIRCKINTEHWLAL

    Reputations:
    1,407
    Messages:
    3,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Same here...
     
  5. davepermen

    davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,972
    Messages:
    7,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    what benefit do you have from deleting it? 5mb of freespace? lots of tv content distributors (like netflix, swisscom tv, many others) use mediaroom for their content distribution. and that is silverlight based on the front end.
     
  6. MidnightSun

    MidnightSun Emodicon

    Reputations:
    6,668
    Messages:
    8,224
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    231
    There's no real bloat or anything with SilverLight, and without it, certain websites/functions don't work. Why not install it?
     
  7. razorjack

    razorjack Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I agree silver never did me wrong........it's my friend.....
     
  8. H.A.L. 9000

    H.A.L. 9000 Occam's Chainsaw

    Reputations:
    6,415
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    552
    Trophy Points:
    281
    Netflix. :)
     
  9. jnjroach

    jnjroach Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    431
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Most of the Microsoft Sites use it and so does the Live Services such as SkyDrive....
     
  10. rippeer

    rippeer Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    57
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    NETFLIX FOR THE WIN
    Yes I typed in caps!
     
  11. Pirx

    Pirx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,001
    Messages:
    3,005
    Likes Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Like others have said, there is absolutely no reason to not have Silverlight installed. As a matter of fact, if you consider the ratio of usefulness over amount of system resources used by this particular install, Silverlight is probably among the very best programs to have installed on your machine.
     
  12. olegsomphane

    olegsomphane Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Netflix, because Comcast has a terrible agenda for the consumers right now... (see net neutrality stuff) :)
     
  13. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    It's only because Microsoft bought them off. Netflix used to run in Flash, and it was good and compatible with everything out there.
     
  14. davepermen

    davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,972
    Messages:
    7,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    pita: problem is, silverlight is actually better suited for streaming. flash could do it, too, but till now hasn't implemented it. the way it's usable in silverlight is auto-adaptable to cpu, gpu and bandwith, so instead of hickups or what ever, you could just get an a bit more blurry picture if you download something beside, etc.

    silverlight is much less of a resource hog typically, too. it's really a nice platform, and the showroom platform is, too.

    i'm glad i don't have to install any adobe products on my systems ever again. it's a bit cheating, chrome has it integrated. but i like to not have to care about updates. silverlight does it trough windows updates, which is great.
     
  15. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    The problem is that it kicks Linux users out of being able to use Netflix. I have a MythTV media center, so it's really freakin' annoying.

    I have much less love for Microsoft than Adobe. Adobe's older products may be bloated, but they've made some great strides with it recently, and Adobe is properly cross-platform, unlike anything Microsoft does.
     
  16. Matt is Pro

    Matt is Pro I'm a PC, so?

    Reputations:
    347
    Messages:
    2,169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I just keep it installed. No reason not to, IMO.
     
  17. davepermen

    davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,972
    Messages:
    7,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    which is why microsoft helps and supports moonlight.

    but you're onl inux, it's obvious you don't have much love for microsoft.
     
  18. Pitabred

    Pitabred Linux geek con rat flail!

    Reputations:
    3,300
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    They don't really, though. The only stumbling block to supporting Netflix with Mono is Microsoft Playready DRM, and it has been for years. Microsoft isn't helping.

    This was a corporate power play, designed to get the Silverlight install base increased so they could fight Adobe. Nothing more, nothing less. Flash was working fine and developing nicely for Netflix, it's just that Microsoft came in with pantsloads of cash.

    That said, I do have Silverlight installed on my Windows machines. I use PlayOn on my desktop so I can stream to my media center. I just don't think Silverlight is a great technology. It's another instance of Microsoft buying into a market because they wanted to, not because they had a bunch to offer or did anything different.
     
  19. davepermen

    davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,972
    Messages:
    7,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    silverlight is a side product of their .net framework, and nothing big in itself. so no, it's not another instance of microsoft buying into a market bull.

    and it's understandable that the drm isn't in the opensource version. it would be nice to release a binary only version for linux, though.

    i did some development in flash, and do some in .net (not that much in silverlight). if i have the choice, i would never ever touch flash. it's very inefficient and uselessly complicated. and the video support is much less than the one in silverlight. it's right now the best option for streaming, really.

    but in the end it doesn't matter. discussion is about having it installed on a windows pc or not. there's no harm in having it, there can be harm in not having it => uninstalling it is stupid.