The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Windows 7 arriving early - M$ to show off OS on October 28

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by fonduekid, Sep 25, 2008.

  1. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Mime with Tourette's

    Reputations:
    1,163
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    That makes it the only OS most young folks have ever seen, and perhaps the first time they have experienced a change that directly affects them as well.
     
  2. booboo12

    booboo12 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    4,062
    Messages:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Agreed, people seem to be really resistant to change. But how can a product evolve and get better if things exactly stay the same? I think Vista's the best out of every version I've used.
     
  3. Thomas

    Thomas McLovin

    Reputations:
    1,988
    Messages:
    5,253
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Hell, Ubuntu, OS X, Solaris, most OSes have there logo slapped everywhere.....
     
  4. jibberjabbers

    jibberjabbers Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    True, but when XP came out, it had mostly good reviews for it. When Vista came out, it was trash. So they went back to XP.

    4 years from now, people will still think Vista is trash. Lets see how Window 7 does.

    I'm using Both XP and Vista. XP so far has no major problems for me. Vista on the other hand, has issues. Vista looks much nicer though. But takes longer to load. Like a good 1.5 minute longer to load.
     
  5. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Mime with Tourette's

    Reputations:
    1,163
    Messages:
    3,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I found XP, pre-SP2, to be junk. I found Vista, both pre-SP1 and SP1, to be quite good.
     
  6. sakor1

    sakor1 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I also much prefer Vista.

    It is faster, looks better and is just as easy to use from my experience on multiple computers. I still have to use XP in my work computer, and its fine, but to me Vista is definately preferred. Never really got what all of the complaints were about, I have never had a driver issue (using 64-bit version), only a few programs that wouldn't work (mostly because they weren't compatible with 64-bit), etc.... I suppose that experience may differ a little with different hardware configurations but I think it has been blown way out of proportion.

    Oh well, still excited to see what Windows 7 turns out like!

    Stu
     
  7. paul_r_d

    paul_r_d Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    36
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm not slamming Vista, I use it and I quite like it. Myabe its time for a whole new OS. IU completely different. I am not sure how much uproar (if any) there was when Windows 3.1 was ditched and the new different IU of 95 was released. Maybe its time for that again. Goodby start buttom which has been around for 13 years.
     
  8. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Compatibility: Every application I have runs under Vista x64. This includes very old games (Age of Empires I, circa 1998), homebrew apps like emulators, and everything else. Apps that don't work basically can't, such as antivirus type things. Oh noes, new OS requires new antivirus! Note that people already went through this with XP (as most home users did not use Win2K) so it's not like a new thing.

    Ease of Use: Learning curve? It's been five years, and the interface had to change to keep up with the times. Figure, five years: Five years before XP, it was 1996. There were still plenty of people whining about how Win95 was all new and fancy and nobody could figure it out compared to Win 3.1. Win95's odd interface and poor "ease of use" was a popular sticking point in those days.

    Feature control: I'm not sure what you want, but the typical user (ie. soccer mom) doesn't care about this. What kinds of things do you believe Vista no longer lets the user do? What features do we not have control over?
     
← Previous page