I was about to get an Eee PC 1005HA and have found there to be quite a considerable price difference between the Windows 7 starter and windows XP versions. The question is, is Windows 7 starter worth the upgrade from XP on this particular platform?
There are plenty of reports of netbooks with windows 7 starter having worse battery performance by about 15%.
I was wondering whether anyone has run any benchmarks making comparisons between these 2 OS's specifically on netbooks.
-
Better than Vista
Better than XP
Better than OS X
Better than Ubuntu
What am I?
*angels chorus*
​
But yeah, windows 7 SHOULD hold better performance etc- as to the battery life, try changing the powerplan...Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
I'd stick with XP over Win7 Starter...
you can have only 3 programs open in Win7 starter and can't run full aero.
Win7 Home Premium is another animal though, and i'd definitely recommend that one... -
However, Starter can run as many apps as you want it to. It is no longer limited to 3 apps at once. -
EEEPC with XP... is cheaper because XP is older than Win7, and want to finish with the XP system to make room for newer systems.
I recommend you look for Nvdia ION platform netbooks. Lenovo makes one, and I think ASUS is going to have one in the near future, IIRC. It provides you with greater performance, and will run Windows 7 full without issues.. for a netbook that is. -
No need to look for some fancy stuff, just change 1GB RAM into 2GB and you're good to go. -
I have the nb205 from Toshiba, upgraded to 2 GB of RAM running Win 7 Ultimate with-out issue and it runs just as well as XP did. I get 6.5-9 hours of battery on each charge depending on usuage which is what I had with XP.
Jeff
Windows 7 performance on netbooks?
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by canonyau, Nov 21, 2009.