The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Windows Vista for Me?

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by i_baked_cookies, Jan 19, 2007.

  1. i_baked_cookies

    i_baked_cookies Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have an Acer Travelmate 8204, it has 2 gigs of RAM, 2ghz Core Duo, and an ATI x1600 graphics card. It's got a Windows Vista Capable sticker on it. Will Vista be slower than XP, or is it designed to be faster?

    What I'm wondering really is if searching, browsing files, editing pictures w/ photoshop, etc. will be slower than when I'm using XP Pro now.

    Also, will gaming slow down?
     
  2. ra990

    ra990 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have an 8204 and ran vista for a few weeks. It seemed as fast as XP, but not faster. Games were generally about 10fps slower, but thats probably because the ATI beta drivers suck.

    However, the major disadvantage to Vista is that eats up battery life like candy. In XP, on my 8204, I easily get around 3:30 hours. With Vista, I couldn't get anywhere over 2 hours. Since Aero relies heavily on the GPU, it is used a lot more than in XP, hence the increased battery usage.

    For a portable, I would stay away from Vista if battery life is your concern. At least until they improve that aspect.
     
  3. JadedRaverLA

    JadedRaverLA Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    273
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    With a fast dual-core processor and 2 GB of RAM (which you have) Vista should feel notably faster than XP. If you only have 1 GB RAM and a slow dual-core or any single-core processor then it runs about the same... maybe a slight advantage to Vista. Lower specs than that, and you should stick with XP or upgrade you system.

    As for battery life, I like aero, so I leave the system set to balanced mode when I'm on battery. The battery life is slightly les than XP (maybe 15-20 minutes) but that's it. If you set your machine on Vista's Power saver mode, then aero will be automatically disabled and you should get XP-like or better battery life.
     
  4. tpoynton

    tpoynton Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    44
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Will photoshop on windows XP take advantage of the multithreading capabilities of the processor? If I recall, photoshop has been written to take advantage of multi core processors. While I dont have the answer, it may factor into your decision making...
     
  5. JadedRaverLA

    JadedRaverLA Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    273
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    tpoynton -- yes, the latest versions of Photoshop are multi-threaded regardless of your OS choice. Vista just seems to have a better thread scheduler than XP does, so programs and the OS seem to take better advantage of the second core.
     
  6. tpoynton

    tpoynton Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    44
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    THANKS for the info. You really do learn something new every day!
     
  7. i_baked_cookies

    i_baked_cookies Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So, the drivers for my ATI x1600 should be current, working, and fine when Vista is offically released in a week or so? The switch-over from XP to Vista will pose no problems?