The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Windows Vista with FAT32 ??

    Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by TuxDude, Aug 8, 2007.

  1. TuxDude

    TuxDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Hi....

    I have not used Vista so far but I came to know just now that the drive Vista must be installed should be on a NTFS drive (which is so sick :( ).... I've always been a FAT32 fan all along.....

    I know Windows does not allow you to make a FAT32 partition greater than 32 GB of size but can read FAT32 partitions upto 128 GB or so.... So to solve this issue some 3rd party utilities can be used to creater larger size FAT32 partitions....

    But anyway does anyone know why Vista is strict with installing only on NTFS partitions ? And is there any way to install Vista on a FAT32 partition ? Or may be is it possible to install Vista on a NTFS partition first and then after the installation convert the partition to FAT32 ?? :D
     
  2. INCSlayer

    INCSlayer Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    it forces you to do that because FAT32 SUCKS on anything bigger then 3.9 GB since it cant handle files bigger then ~4GB
     
  3. deputy963

    deputy963 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    117
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Well, Slayer said it... Though in a different way than I would have :)

    Have a read here - http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm

    FAT32's usefulness is limited for most users, with the exception of USB flash drives and maybe drives used for backup purposes. NTFS is the way to go. It's more efficient in it's use of space due to the smaller cluster size and it's ability to handle errors is greatly improved over FAT32.
     
  4. TuxDude

    TuxDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    But not all people come across files with size greater than 4 GB isnt it ? Also reading and writing to NTFS partitions under linux poses many problems.....
     
  5. deputy963

    deputy963 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    117
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    If you're concerned about Linux compatibility then make a 10 to 15GB NTFS partition for Vista, another partition (file system of your choice) for Linux, and keep your data on a third partition (file system of your choice).
     
  6. TuxDude

    TuxDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    That is not what I actually meant.... I meant accessing all the data from Linux partition.... The thing is you cant access the files present on the main Vista partition from linux.... I've heard there are some NTFS driver modules that can be built over the linux kernel to access them but not actually sure how worthy they are...

    Of course if i get my laptop with Vista loaded I would probably be having to use such a setup only (first NTFS partition only for Vista files, a linux boot partition, my other fat32 data partitions, a linux swap partition and finall the linux partition)
     
  7. INCSlayer

    INCSlayer Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    nowadays that is not true all you have to do is install the ntfs-3g packet for your distro and then edit fstab from ntfs to ntfs-3g and remount and your done
     
  8. Padmé

    Padmé NBR Super Pink Princess

    Reputations:
    4,674
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
     
  9. LIVEFRMNYC

    LIVEFRMNYC Blah Blah Blah!!!

    Reputations:
    3,741
    Messages:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Why would you be a FAT32 Fan?
     
  10. Joga

    Joga Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    138
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    NTFS read/write works just fine with Linux (I know from personal experience). As INCslayer stated above, ntfs-3g has been around for a while now, and it works pretty much perfectly. A little google searching will provide tutorials for getting it installed for your particular distro and mounting your NTFS partitions to Linux, although it's really not hard at all.
     
  11. TuxDude

    TuxDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    255
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I like FAT32 because it is easily preferable for recovery from DOS and mini-windows 98 (in the Hiren's boot cd) when my OS crashes.... If I use NTFS then I got to load DOS with NTFS drivers to view the files.... Now I guess there are some read/write drivers as well for accessing NTFS FS under DOS too.... I guess it all depends when I get my laptop and give it a try :D