Hi again lads,
I just wanted to ask a quick question. I found a lot of my favourite apps in a portable form on softpedia, like:
firefox/chrome
imgburn
vlc media player
notepad ++
file zilla
etc.
Is there some sort of disadvantage of using these apps in a portable form like loss of speed or something like this? or is it only beneficial in terms of a clean registry?
many thanks![]()
-
The premise is more about not having to install them to use them, they can go where you go. It's great for corporate environments that don't allow installations by regular users. Speed isn't the utmost concern though only apps that cache alot (like firefox/chrome) "might" see a performance hit in usage.
I have used VLC and a few other portable apps and the apps run fast. -
jackluo923 Notebook Virtuoso
You'll definetly loose some performance if you use portable apps. Depending on the way the portable application is made, you might not be able to see the difference.
-
www.portableapps.com is the home for that kind of stuff
-
I don't see any difference with most apps on an external drive. I do have one flash drive that runs slow, but that's the speed of the flash memory, not anything to do with the apps. I run Firefox, Gimp, CCleaner, VLC player on a regular basis.
-
-
-
Ideally, I'd like to know how fast the USB is before I purchase it.
portable software check
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by potentv, Apr 15, 2009.